Healthy Eating Index-2015 Scores Vary by Types of Food Outlets in the United States

Abstract

Diet quality in the United States is improving over time but remains poor. Food outlets influence diet quality and represent the environments in which individuals make choices about food purchases and intake. The objective of this study was to use the Healthy Eating Index-2015 (HEI-2015) to evaluate the quality of foods consumed from the four major outlets where food is obtained—stores, full-service restaurants, quick-services restaurants, and schools—and to assess changes over time. This cross-sectional study used 24 h dietary recall data from eight cycles (2003–2004 to 2017–2018) of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Linear trend estimation was used to test for changes in HEI scores over time, and balanced repeated replicate weighted linear regression was used to test for differences in total and component scores between types of food outlets. Overall, Americans are not consuming a mix of foods from any major category of food outlet that aligns with dietary guidelines. The total score for schools (65/100 points) and stores (62/100 points) was significantly higher than full-service (51/100 points) and quick-service (39/100 points) restaurants (p < 0.0001). HEI scores significantly improved over time for schools (p < 0.001), including an increase in whole grains from less than 1 point in 2003–2004 to 7 out of 10 points in 2017–2018. In 2017–2018, schools received the maximum score for total fruits, whole fruits, and dairy. Continued research on strategies for improving the quality of foods consumed from restaurants and stores is warranted.

2024 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association

“…An analysis of the 4 major outlets where food is obtained, that is, stores, quick-serve restaurants, full-service restaurants, and schools, using 24-hour dietary recall data from 8 cycles of the NHANES showed that Americans are not consuming foods that align with the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. 18 The HEI-2015 score for schools (65/100 points) and stores (62/100 points) was significantly higher than for full-service (51/100 points) and quick-service (39/100 points) restaurants ( P <0.0001).…”

The Contribution of Nutrients of Concern to the Diets of 18-to-30-Year-Old Australians from Food Prepared Outside Home Differs by Food Outlet Types: The MYMeals Cross-Sectional Study

“…Fruit, vegetables, and wholegrains intakes have been shown to be suboptimal in many Australians' diets [36,37] and are not always available in fast-food chain offerings, as documented in US restaurants and fast-food chains [38]. Another study using the MYMeals data showed that most main meals prepared at home were predominantly from the five food groups [39] defined in the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating as nutritious foods [40].…”

“Keep Your Chin Up, and Keep Eating”: Perceptions of Barriers and Facilitators to Healthful Dietary Behaviors Among Individuals With Gastrointestinal Cancer and Caregivers

“…A radar graph was created to provide an illustration of how patients and caregivers obtained their overall HEI-2020 scores (https://epi.grants.cancer.gov/hei/interpret-visualize-hei-scores.html). 33 Each axis on the radar graph represents a unique component score. Component scores were graphed as percentages of the maximum possible score, for example, a Seafood and Plant Proteins score of 3/5 was graphed as 60%.…”