2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11524-016-0122-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Healthy Cities of Tomorrow: the Case for Large Scale Built Environment–Health Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 134 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When John Snow employed a primitive GIS technique with point-based cholera epidemic data, the science of healthy cities changed and so did the built environmental response [ 36 , 37 ]. A new science of healthy cities is rapidly emerging as a result of large spatialized, gene-environment data platforms [ 38 , 39 , 40 ]. The emphasis in the past decade has been on sedentary disease.…”
Section: Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When John Snow employed a primitive GIS technique with point-based cholera epidemic data, the science of healthy cities changed and so did the built environmental response [ 36 , 37 ]. A new science of healthy cities is rapidly emerging as a result of large spatialized, gene-environment data platforms [ 38 , 39 , 40 ]. The emphasis in the past decade has been on sedentary disease.…”
Section: Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas the aforementioned risk and protective factors are relatively well understood, how the built, natural, and social environments together affect mental disorders remains less clear ( Tost et al, 2015 , Stickley et al, 2017 , Adli et al, 2017 , Heinz et al, 2013 , Peen et al, 2010 , Prüss-Üstün and Corvalán, 2006 , Nieuwenhuijsen, 2016 ). There is increasing evidence that the built environment (e.g., urban morphology, land use, and street layout) might be a determinant of mental health ( Rao et al, 2007 , Sarkar and Webster, 2017 ). Although the existing knowledge is inconclusive, and the individual environments were frequently studied in isolation ( Mair et al, 2008 , Weich et al, 2002 , Evans, 2003 , Saarloos et al, 2011 , James et al, 2017 ), it seems that, for example, higher urban densities increase social interactions that may decrease the risk of psychotic disorders ( Kawachi and Berkman, 2001 ).…”
Section: Urban Environments and Mental Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of this literature shows an inverted U-shaped curve relationship with a positive impact in the cost-benefits of beginning agglomeration but negative with higher figures. See, for example, Sarkar and Webster [66] and [67] regarding the relevance of combining density with green spaces, pedestrian areas and other facilities to avoid health problems in the city. In the same line, Gruebner [68] highlight the relationship between social isolation and discrimination as well as poverty in the neighbourhood contribute to the mental health burden and the built environment.…”
Section: Consequences Of Urban Sprawl: the Renewed Relevance Of The Tmentioning
confidence: 99%