2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.06.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Healthy 3D knee kinematics during gait: Differences between women and men, and correlation with x-ray alignment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
19
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, using a 10-fold validation, the prediction performance reached 84.4% for men and 75.5% for women but it was limited to 71 % when the two sexes were grouped together. This confirms that prediction models should be sex-specific to achieve better results and supports previous studies highlighting the differences in kinematics between men and women [30,31].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, using a 10-fold validation, the prediction performance reached 84.4% for men and 75.5% for women but it was limited to 71 % when the two sexes were grouped together. This confirms that prediction models should be sex-specific to achieve better results and supports previous studies highlighting the differences in kinematics between men and women [30,31].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…To be considered accurate, a classifier must be both highly sensitive and highly specific. The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were computed according to the following Significant differences in 3D knee kinematics between men and women have been reported in the literature, both in healthy and knee OA subjects [30,31]. Therefore, three different prediction systems were trained: one each for the male and the female population and one for the overall data-set (male and female together) to account for the sex-specific aspects of kinematics.…”
Section: Classification Rate =mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The kinematic findings of the present study are consistent with those reported in similar studies that illustrate joint movement during walking. 26,29,30 However, this study describes joint movement with ranges of normality that are narrower than those reported by said studies, 22,29,31 which implies lower amplitude graphs. For example, Fryzowicz et al 22 show an articular arc in the sagittal plane of the pelvis close to 6 degrees, while Bruening et al 32 report 4.5 degrees of anteversion in men, which is significantly lower than the 9.5 degrees reported in the present study, thus denoting greater pelvic anteversion in our study population.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Biomechanical knee assessment is increasingly used in gait analysis as a tool for characterizing the knee function [1], understanding pathological knee alterations [2], and assessing the progression of knee pathologies and their impact on gait [3]. It has already been suggested that the type and severity of biomechanical changes should be assessed since they can impact treatment outcomes [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%