Healthcare systems and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) therapies--an international review: access to ESRD treatments

Abstract

Assessment of healthcare technology and economics can be used to assess the access to healthcare, its quality and efficacy as well as its cost and cost efficiency. This report addresses these issues for the provision of care for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. An international comparison of access to ESRD treatment modalities was made with reference to the healthcare provider structure in a range of industrial countries. The countries were grouped into 'public' (Beveridge model), 'mixed' (Bismarck model) and 'private' (Private Insurance model). In 'public' provider countries, 20-52% of dialysis patients are treated with home therapies (haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis), and the number of patients with renal transplants is 45-81% of all ESRD patients. In 'mixed' provider countries, only 9 17% of all dialysis patients are treated with home therapies, and 20-48% of ESRD patients have renal transplants. In 'private' provider countries, 17% of US and 6% Japanese dialysis patients are treated with home therapies. Japan has 0.3% and the US has 26% of ESRD patients who receive renal transplants. It thus seems that provider structure influences access to and choice of ESRD treatment. With a growing elderly population and longer life expectancy, there will be an increased requirement for ESRD treatments in all industrial countries. Equal access to, and quality of ESRD care in the future will require adequate funding and reimbursement strategies in a cost-constrained healthcare environment. growing elderly population, new and innovative healthcare technologies, increasing expectations of the population and the dilemma of economic constraints. Therefore, new disciplines such as health technology assessment and healthcare economics are developing to support the needs of health policy decision makers. Their main objective is to create a balance between the three key factors of a healthcare system: access to healthcare (equity for all), quality of healthcare (efficacy) and finally the cost or cost efficiency of healthcare provision [1; see also Lameire et al., this issue]. This report will assess access to healthcare in a very specific and very costly area that of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). An international comparison of access to ESRD treatment for patients from a series of industrial countries will be used as a means for evaluation of this access.

Factors Influencing the Decision to Start Renal Replacement Therapy: Results of a Survey Among European Nephrologists

“…25 Previous studies showed a positive association between RRT incidence and the share of private for-profit HD facilities. 26,27 Our results are in line with them and add that the higher incidence may be caused in part by applying higher target eGFRs at RRT initiation. With this international survey including 11 European countries, we examined a wide range of current opinions of nephrologists' on their decision for when to start RRT.…”

Global Trends in Rates of Peritoneal Dialysis

“…3 For example, countries with private dialysis providers generally use PD for a smaller proportion of dialysis patients than countries in which public providers dominate. [25][26][27] The proliferation of HD units in some countries has increased the availability of HD, creating an incentive to use that capacity rather than home dialysis modalities. 23,28 Some have raised concerns that nephrology training programs are deficient in PD and do not adequately prepare young nephrologists to provide care for PD patients.…”

Comparison of Direct Medical Costs between Automated and Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis

“…Comparisons of our results with those from other authors (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27) are difficult because of differences in the methods of data collection and evaluation, resources analyzed, period of investigation, and cost of living in various locales. However, our study more comprehensibly evaluated the principal DMC of the medical care process.…”