2013
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Healthcare information technology and economics

Abstract: At the 2011 American College of Medical Informatics (ACMI) Winter Symposium we studied the overlap between health IT and economics and what leading healthcare delivery organizations are achieving today using IT that might offer paths for the nation to follow for using health IT in healthcare reform. We recognized that health IT by itself can improve health value, but its main contribution to health value may be that it can make possible new care delivery models to achieve much larger value. Health IT is a crit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence from within specific health organizations suggests EHR use, in conjunction with other advanced care processes, have beneficial effects on patients. [32][33][34]36 Our study's findings add to that literature by examining HIT, interspecialty communication, and care management supports not just in integrated health systems but in a nationally representative sample of more typical PCPs and their patients. Indeed, one of this study's strengths is the very descriptive battery of items on HIT/EHR functionalities used by physicians.…”
Section: Practice Supports and Care Processesmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Evidence from within specific health organizations suggests EHR use, in conjunction with other advanced care processes, have beneficial effects on patients. [32][33][34]36 Our study's findings add to that literature by examining HIT, interspecialty communication, and care management supports not just in integrated health systems but in a nationally representative sample of more typical PCPs and their patients. Indeed, one of this study's strengths is the very descriptive battery of items on HIT/EHR functionalities used by physicians.…”
Section: Practice Supports and Care Processesmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…29,30 To date, HIT has been demonstrated to help care delivery in other ways (eg, increased adherence to guideline-concordant care, decreased medication errors, decreased testing redundancy, and enhanced surveillance and monitoring). [31][32][33][34] But some also have raised concerns about potential harms if HIT is not designed or used in a way that maximizes clinical information and patient safety. 35 To our knowledge, our study is the first to use nationally representative data at the individual physician level to examine whether EHR use in ambulatory settings is associated with potentially preventable hospitalizations.…”
Section: Practice Supports and Care Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 Unprecedented government and organizational investment in development and implementation of HIT has risen substantially, particularly since 2008. 2 In spite of financial expenditures, most organizations have failed to consider a clinical practice platform, which is also an essential component in transforming healthcare. 3 The Institute of Medicine (IOM) identified the need to focus on what works in healthcare, as it relates to evidence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…investment (ROI). Such financial return is expected from improved health professionals' work-flow management, suppression of order transcription costs, reduced length of stays, reduced duplicated actions, improved communication between stakeholders, and better financial recovery from third party payers [2,[5][6][7][8][9][10]. From an academic point of view, a CIS should foster clinical research (e.g., through better patient inclusion in public and privately sponsored clinical trials) and accelerate publication of novel outcomes in peer-reviewed journals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%