2018
DOI: 10.3390/nu10010034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Healthcare Expenditure and Productivity Cost Savings from Reductions in Cardiovascular Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Associated with Increased Intake of Cereal Fibre among Australian Adults: A Cost of Illness Analysis

Abstract: An ageing population and growing prevalence of chronic diseases including cardiovascular disease (CVD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) are putting increased pressure on healthcare expenditure in Australia. A cost of illness analysis was conducted to assess the potential savings in healthcare expenditure and productivity costs associated with lower prevalence of CVD and T2D resulting from increased intake of cereal fibre. Modelling was undertaken for three levels of increased dietary fibre intake using cereal fibre: … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More complex approaches to health economic modeling are available such as cohort models and microsimulation models [16,17]. A cost-of-illness [7,8] or cost-benefit [10] approach, or a scenario analysis [11] approach, similar to the current analysis are commonly used for public health nutrition models, and these approaches are particularly appropriate when there are limited data about consumption of a specific food, the lag between increased (or decreased) consumption and the health effect, and how other population risk factors may affect the change in incidence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More complex approaches to health economic modeling are available such as cohort models and microsimulation models [16,17]. A cost-of-illness [7,8] or cost-benefit [10] approach, or a scenario analysis [11] approach, similar to the current analysis are commonly used for public health nutrition models, and these approaches are particularly appropriate when there are limited data about consumption of a specific food, the lag between increased (or decreased) consumption and the health effect, and how other population risk factors may affect the change in incidence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous scenario analyses have modeled changes in healthcare costs from beneficial shifts in dietary patterns and provide an indication of the potentially substantial economic impact associated with modifications to the population's diet [7][8][9][10][11]. The purpose of this study is to estimate the impact on healthcare costs associated with a reduced incidence of total CVD based on modeling incremental increases in whole grains consumption as a proportion of total grains up to levels recommended in the DGA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Targeting the fibre intake of lower SES groups has the potential to bring about greater health and economic benefits, since lower SES groups have higher levels of health risk factors in Australia [ 9 ]. Modelling evidence has estimated that increasing the cereal fibre intake of the lower SES groups of Australian adults results in greater economic savings than implementing the same measure for the higher SES groups [ 10 ]. The perceived monetary cost of a healthy diet has been identified as a key factor in the socio-economic differences in dietary intakes [ 63 , 64 , 65 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In dose-response meta-analyses of prospective cohort studies, additional 7–10 g of fibre per day was associated with a 9% reduction in cardiovascular disease (CVD) [ 6 ], a 9% reduction in type 2 diabetes (T2D) [ 7 ], a 10% reduction in colorectal cancer [ 8 ], and an 11% reduction in all-cause mortality [ 4 ]. In Australia, chronic diseases are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality [ 9 ], and a recent cost-of-illness analysis reported that if the intake of fibre in Australia increased using cereal fibre, economic savings of AUD$17.8 million–1.6 billion for CVD and AUD$18.2 million–1.7 billion for T2D could be realised in healthcare expenditure and productivity costs [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent review of studies worldwide, which included the 2007 Australian National Children’s Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey, reported that fibre intakes was lower than recommended in all adult and most childhood populations [ 6 ]. In the most recent 2011–2012 National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey (NNPAS) in Australia, more than 1 in 2 children and more than 7 in 10 adults had fibre intakes below the Adequate Intake (AI) (14–28 g for children, 25 g for adult females, and 30 g for adult males), and more than 4 in 5 adults did not meet the Suggested Dietary Target to reduce chronic disease risk (28 g for women and 38 g for men) [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%