2017
DOI: 10.1097/qai.0000000000001236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Healthcare Access and PrEP Continuation in San Francisco and Miami After the US PrEP Demo Project

Abstract: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for prevention of HIV infection has demonstrated efficacy in randomized controlled trials as well as in demonstration projects. For PrEP implementation to result in significant reductions in HIV incidence for men who have sex with men (MSM) in the United States, sufficient access to PrEP care and continued engagement outside of demonstration projects is required. We report the results of a follow-up survey of 173 former participants from the Miami and San Francisco sites of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
66
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most MSM who continued PrEP in Miami and San Francisco were White, non-Latino MSM (68.3%). 1 These racial disparities echo preliminary findings of a three-site study finding that race was an important factor in predicting lower likelihood of being retained in PrEP care. 3 Taken together, these findings suggest that African American and Hispanic/Latino MSM may need culturally tailored case management services to promote optimal rates of retention in care.…”
Section: To the Editorssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most MSM who continued PrEP in Miami and San Francisco were White, non-Latino MSM (68.3%). 1 These racial disparities echo preliminary findings of a three-site study finding that race was an important factor in predicting lower likelihood of being retained in PrEP care. 3 Taken together, these findings suggest that African American and Hispanic/Latino MSM may need culturally tailored case management services to promote optimal rates of retention in care.…”
Section: To the Editorssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…1 Their open-label demonstration study evaluated 173 patients in San Francisco and Miami following completion of a National Institutes of Health sponsored PrEP demonstration project. 2 PrEP was originally provided free of charge at these sites during a three-year study.…”
Section: To the Editorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in our survey where 39.5% reported cost as a barrier, economic concerns are prominent barriers to care and patients are more likely to initially accept PrEP when it is offered directly and for free [11,30]. Real and perceived barriers to PrEP care including cost, transportation, language issues, stigma, and immigration status can create disparities in PrEP engagement [31,32] that particularly impact the drug-using community. Furthermore, PrEP is an understudied and underutilized HIV prevention strategy for PWID.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 78%
“…Perhaps the most pervasive finding in the PrEP implementation literature to date is the importance of financial and health care access barriers in limiting PrEP uptake. 70 Insurance status remains a critical determinant of PrEP access; 71 in one study of GBMSM in three US states, uninsured patients were over four times less likely to be taking PrEP compared with those who were insured. 1 Financial concerns impact not only access to PrEP but also shape perceptions of its merits as a prevention strategy.…”
Section: Current Guidelines For Prep Prescription and Follow-up May Bmentioning
confidence: 99%