2023
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health worker perspectives on access to antenatal care in rural plains Nepal during the COVID-19 pandemic

Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic affected access to antenatal care in low and middle-income countries where anaemia in pregnancy is prevalent. We analyse how health workers provided antenatal care and the factors affecting access to antenatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Kapilvastu district in the western plains of Nepal. We used qualitative and quantitative methodologies, conducting eight semi-structured interviews with health workers who provided antenatal care during the pandemic, and a questionnaire containin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
(36 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to participants, there were frequent shortages of non-pharmaceutical prevention supplies, including facemasks, PPE, gloves, face shields, and sanitisers. This finding coincides with a study in Nepal [ 52 ] found that lack of PPE affected ANC provision.Our results also align with the findings of a global survey exploring how wearing facemasks affected gesture communication and facial expressions between patients and healthcare providers [ 51 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…According to participants, there were frequent shortages of non-pharmaceutical prevention supplies, including facemasks, PPE, gloves, face shields, and sanitisers. This finding coincides with a study in Nepal [ 52 ] found that lack of PPE affected ANC provision.Our results also align with the findings of a global survey exploring how wearing facemasks affected gesture communication and facial expressions between patients and healthcare providers [ 51 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%