2006
DOI: 10.1080/09540120500429018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health trends among drug users attending needle exchange programmes in Switzerland (1994–2000)

Abstract: As a part of an assessment of the Swiss drug harm-reduction policy, cross-sectional surveys were conducted in 1994, 1996 and 2000 among attenders of all needle exchange programmes (NEP) in Switzerland to assess changes in specific aspects of their health related to drug use. Data were gathered in each NEP over one week, using a questionnaire completed partly with an interviewer and partly self administered. The questionnaire covered socio-demographic characteristics, drug consumption, risk, prevention behaviou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
14
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are in line with previously available data from the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health and the SWISS HIV Cohort Study [19,24,26] and underline the effectiveness of measures that have been taken since HIV/AIDS became a major public health concern in the context of open drug scenes that developed in Switzerland’s largest cities in the early 1980s. Between 1985 and 1995, HIV/AIDS incidence and prevalence rates were the highest in Europe [56,57].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings are in line with previously available data from the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health and the SWISS HIV Cohort Study [19,24,26] and underline the effectiveness of measures that have been taken since HIV/AIDS became a major public health concern in the context of open drug scenes that developed in Switzerland’s largest cities in the early 1980s. Between 1985 and 1995, HIV/AIDS incidence and prevalence rates were the highest in Europe [56,57].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…These data resulted from cross-sectional surveys conducted in 1993, 1994, 1996, 2000, and 2006 by means of questionnaires distributed to IDUs in LTFs in ten different cantons in Switzerland [24]. It is thereby estimated that over half of IDUs frequenting LTFs simultaneously receive OMT [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent evidence shows that receptive (taking used needles from someone else) and distributive (giving used needles to someone else) sharing among IDUs has declined [3-7]. However, there are also risks associated with re-using drug injection equipment such as cookers, water, filters and alcohol swabs [8-13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies do not inquire about each piece of equipment independently and/or distinguish between receptive, distributive or communal equipment sharing (i.e., using a communal set of equipment to mix and apportion a drug solution to more than one person) [12]. This is important because evidence suggests that IDUs are more likely to report equipment sharing than needle sharing [3,7,14]. As well, some studies report that IDUs are more likely to distribute than receive used injection equipment [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 'newcomers' and the 'heroin-oriented clients' were significantly younger, as expected, heroin still being the first drug injected in Switzerland at the beginning of the injection career [31] . One-day visitors were most frequently in treatment, and newcomers less, as also expected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%