2021
DOI: 10.2217/cer-2021-0047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health technology assessment (HTA) in England, France and Germany: what do matched drug pairs tell us about recommendations by national HTA agencies?

Abstract: Aims: To explore health technology assessment (HTA) outcomes of matched drug pairs by national agencies in Germany (Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss, GBA), France (Haute Autorité de Santé, HAS) and England and Wales (NICE). Methods: We considered published GBA decisions, HAS reports and NICE guidance from January 2011 to June 2018. HTAs of matched pairs were compared overall, and for non-cancer and cancer drugs separately. We further analyzed the role of additional attributes related to cancer therapies. Results: M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All ATMPs in this study were being reimbursed in Germany ( Schaefer et al, 2021 ), except for 2 (i.e., ATMP9 and ATMP13), which had been taken off the market by the company ( Qiu et al, 2022 ). In the German market, all new therapies used to be reimbursed at a price freely set by the company during the first year, after which manufacturers negotiate the price of their product with the social insurance providers ( Epstein and Espín, 2020 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All ATMPs in this study were being reimbursed in Germany ( Schaefer et al, 2021 ), except for 2 (i.e., ATMP9 and ATMP13), which had been taken off the market by the company ( Qiu et al, 2022 ). In the German market, all new therapies used to be reimbursed at a price freely set by the company during the first year, after which manufacturers negotiate the price of their product with the social insurance providers ( Epstein and Espín, 2020 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The law makes an exception for orphan drugs. Added benefit is “assumed” for orphan drugs as soon as they get European central MA if the total expenditure is less than €50 million per year ( Schaefer et al, 2021 ). Hence in these cases the drugs are reimbursed at premium prices.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, if a marginal benefit for a particular approach is seen, a meta-analysis might help to elucidate the next steps ( 10 ). In addition, Health Technology Assessments (HTA) by national agencies may provide additional information on the potential risks and benefits of adopting new standards of care ( 11 ). In the setting of perioperative NSCLC, the need for an expert consensus is arising from the pace of the above-mentioned pivotal trials, the impact on current clinical diagnostic and therapeutic pathways, and the use of short-term or surrogate outcomes of benefit and often inconsistent biomarkers in some of these studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%