Health system governance to support scale up of mental health care in Ethiopia: a qualitative study

Abstract

BackgroundEthiopia is embarking upon a ground-breaking plan to address the high levels of unmet need for mental health care by scaling up mental health care integrated within primary care. Health system governance is expected to impact critically upon the success or otherwise of this important initiative. The objective of the study was to explore the barriers, facilitators and potential strategies to promote good health system governance in relation to scale-up of mental health care in Ethiopia.MethodsA qualitative study was conducted using in-depth interviews. Key informants were selected purposively from national and regional level policy-makers, planners and service developers (n = 7) and district health office administrators and facility heads (n = 10) from a district in southern Ethiopia where a demonstration project to integrate mental health into primary care is underway. Topic guide development and analysis of transcripts were guided by an established framework for assessing health system governance, adapted for the Ethiopian context.ResultsFrom the perspective of respondents, particular strengths of health system governance in Ethiopia included the presence of high level government support, the existence of a National Mental Health Strategy and the focus on integration of mental health care into primary care to improve the responsiveness of the health system. However, both national and district level respondents expressed concerns about low baseline awareness about mental health care planning, the presence of stigmatising attitudes, the level of transparency about planning decisions, limited leadership for mental health, lack of co-ordination of mental health planning, unreliable supplies of medication, inadequate health management information system indicators for monitoring implementation, unsustainable models for specialist mental health professional involvement in supervision and mentoring of primary care staff, lack of community mobilisation for mental health and low levels of empowerment and knowledge undermining meaningful involvement of stakeholders in local mental health care planning.ConclusionsTo support scale-up of mental health care in Ethiopia, there is a critical need to strengthen leadership and co-ordination at the national, regional, zonal and district levels, expand indicators for routine monitoring of mental healthcare, promote service user involvement and address widespread stigma and low mental health awareness.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13033-017-0144-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

At the coalface of collaborative mental health care: A qualitative study of governance and power in district‐level service provision in South Africa

“…Importantly, the complexities and different facets of power dynamics that underwrite attempts towards integrated mental health care are showcased, adding to growing literature on the social mechanisms that influence collaboration. The study confirms and expands on previous studies of the crucial role of health system governance in South African settings, and, importantly, illuminates the role of power in integration and fragmentation of mental health services …”

Strengthening mental health systems in low- and middle-income countries: recommendations from the Emerald programme

“…Poor governance was identified as an important barrier to effective integration of mental healthcare within primary healthcare settings. To address this, the Emerald programme identified the following key governance strategies (see Petersen et al, Abdulmalik et al, Hanlon et al, Marais & Petersen, Mugisha et al, and Upadhaya et al [14][15][16][17][18][19] for further details): strengthening capacity of managers at subnational levels and/or policymakers at the national level to develop and implement integrated plans; strengthening key aspects of the essential health system building blocks to promote responsiveness, efficiency and effectiveness; developing workable mechanisms for intersectoral collaboration, as well as community and patient engagement; and developing innovative approaches to improve mental health literacy and achieve stigma reduction. A recurring challenge for good governance is adequate financing, which can be addressed via evidence-based advocacy and budgetary re-prioritisation.…”

Using a mentorship model to localise the Practical Approach to Care Kit (PACK): from South Africa to Ethiopia

“…Poverty remains a challenge despite 7.5% average annual growth of gross domestic product per capita from 2009 to 201514 (see box 1). The health system is generally orientated to respond to acute episodes of illness, with healthcare providers tending to focus on the presenting health condition 8 15. This is despite clear evidence of high levels of comorbidity for all chronic conditions, which adversely affect health outcomes and quality of life if not addressed adequately 16.…”