Health symptoms, inflammation, and bioaerosol exposure in workers at biowaste pretreatment plants

Rasmussen, Pil U.; Frederiksen, Margit W.; Carøe, Tanja K.; Madsen, Anne Mette

doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2023.05.042

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 46 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A study of the exposure to inhalable dust, endotoxins, and microorganisms of Danish domestic wasterecycling industry workers found higher levels of exposure for the production workers than the administrative workers [69]. Additionally, significant differences in microbial exposure between employees working in the production area and those working in offices were also reported for biowaste pretreatment plants [70]. A study on the culturable bioaerosol in four types of buildings (residential, schools, offices, and hospital) in China reported similar bacterial and fungal concentrations as the ones obtained in this study, namely, 203.8 ± 188 CFU/m 3 and 352.5 ± 476 CFU/m 3 , respectively, in Winter [71].…”

Section: Indoor Air Quality In Administrative Offices and Canteen (Ca...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Culturable Bioaerosols Assessment in a Waste-Sorting Plant and UV-C Decontamination

Manuel,

Samardjieva

2024

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Waste-Sorting Plant (WSP) workers are exposed to bioaerosols containing a large variety of bacterial and fungal species, posing a critical health risk that needs to be assessed and mitigated. The present study aimed to evaluate the indoor air quality in a Portuguese WSP and the air decontamination efficiency with UV-C. The concentrations of bacteria and fungi and particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), CO2, relative humidity, and temperature were determined at different hours in manual sorting areas (cabin and ramp) in autumn and winter in 2022 and in administrative offices and canteen in the autumn of 2023. The PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations in the air increased with the daily waste-sorting activities, especially inside the cabin, averaging 22 and 42 μg/m3, respectively, while the CO2 concentration was in the range of 343–578 ppm in both sampling sites. The bacterial species were mainly environmental (mesophilic bacteria) rather than human sources. In the waste-sorting areas, the concentration of bacteria was often found to exceed outdoor values by more than 1000 CFU/m3 on average. Additionally, the concentration of fungi indoors was consistently higher than outdoor values, in many cases exceeding 500 CFU/m3. These findings suggest that workers in these areas are frequently exposed to high levels of microbes. The indoor-to-outdoor (I/O) contamination ratios revealed that the air quality inside the administrative offices and the canteen had high pollutant concentrations during some time periods. The worst scenarios were observed in the canteen and offices with high occupancy in the afternoon. UV-C lamps at 253.7 nm and with 5.0 W irradiation power were used in the sorting cabin to test the indoor air and surface decontamination, and the results showed a high bacterial removal efficacy of over 87.6% after one hour of exposure to UV-C. The present study raises the question of whether 37 °C is the optimal incubation temperature for WSP samples since the microorganisms’ habitat before the sampling had a much lower temperature. As the waste-sorting industry expands, these findings show that the air quality of WSPs remains concerning and requires a holistic approach, integrating the working conditions of all personnel and the implementation and monitoring of mitigation measures.

show abstract

Section: Indoor Air Quality In Administrative Offices and Canteen (Ca...mentioning

confidence: 99%