2005
DOI: 10.1136/ard.2004.033407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health status in rheumatoid arthritis over 7 years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has specifically been suggested to examine the possible effect of time of disease onset longitudinal outcomes in the ORAR 6. Our analyses demonstrated that patients with more recent disease onset had more favourable effects on longitudinal health outcomes (fig 1), with better physical function, less pain and higher utility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has specifically been suggested to examine the possible effect of time of disease onset longitudinal outcomes in the ORAR 6. Our analyses demonstrated that patients with more recent disease onset had more favourable effects on longitudinal health outcomes (fig 1), with better physical function, less pain and higher utility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Changes over time are typically studied in a setting of longitudinal observational studies of a patient cohort,5 and patient registers provide a setting with a high level of internal validity 6. The Oslo RA register (ORAR) provides data that are representative for the entire population in this geographic area.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that priorities for improvement are quite stable over time and not clearly associated with achieved improvements in health status. However, the authors performed a cross-sectional comparison on two partially overlapping populations, thus complicating the interpretation of the results 23. Moreover, the observed improvements in health status were only minimal 23…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, our patient sample had a uniform disease duration. Therefore, in contrast with other cross-sectional population studies (24 -27), the effect of year of assessment was not confounded by disease duration (50). Lastly, our data covered more recent years than previous population studies (23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)37,49); therefore, effects of the newest treatments were included.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%