Health Risk from the Use of Roof-Harvested Rainwater in Southeast Queensland, Australia, as Potable or Nonpotable Water, Determined Using Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment

Abstract

A total of 214 rainwater samples from 82 tanks were collected in urban Southeast Queensland (SEQ) in Australia and analyzed for the presence and numbers of zoonotic bacterial and protozoal pathogens using binary PCR and quantitative PCR (qPCR). Quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) analysis was used to quantify the risk of infection associated with the exposure to potential pathogens from roof-harvested rainwater used as potable or nonpotable water. Of the 214 samples tested, 10.7%, 9.8%, 5.6%, and 0.4% were positive for the Salmonella invA, Giardia lamblia ␤-giardin, Legionella pneumophila mip, and Campylobacter jejuni mapA genes, respectively. Cryptosporidium parvum oocyst wall protein (COWP) could not be detected. The estimated numbers of Salmonella, G. lamblia, and L. pneumophila organisms ranged from 6.5 ؋ 10 1 to 3.8 ؋ 10 2 cells, 0.6 ؋ 10 0 to 3.6 ؋ 10 0 cysts, and 6.0 ؋ 10 1 to 1.7 ؋ 10 2 cells per 1,000 ml of water, respectively. Six risk scenarios were considered for exposure to Salmonella spp., G. lamblia, and L. pneumophila. For Salmonella spp. and G. lamblia, these scenarios were (i) liquid ingestion due to drinking of rainwater on a daily basis, (ii) accidental liquid ingestion due to hosing twice a week, (iii) aerosol ingestion due to showering on a daily basis, and (iv) aerosol ingestion due to hosing twice a week. For L. pneumophila, these scenarios were (i) aerosol inhalation due to showering on a daily basis and (ii) aerosol inhalation due to hosing twice a week. The risk of infection from Salmonella spp., G. lamblia, and L. pneumophila associated with the use of rainwater for showering and garden hosing was calculated to be well below the threshold value of one extra infection per 10,000 persons per year in urban SEQ. However, the risk of infection from ingesting Salmonella spp. and G. lamblia via drinking exceeded this threshold value and indicated that if undisinfected rainwater is ingested by drinking, then the incidences of the gastrointestinal diseases salmonellosis and giardiasis are expected to range from 9.8 ؋ 10 0 to 5.4 ؋ 10

The Relationship Between Distance to Water Source and Moderate-to-Severe Diarrhea in the Global Enterics Multi-Center Study in Kenya, 2008–2011

“…20 Analyses of the containers have shown distributions of pathogenic microbes in rainwater collection systems, though the risk to human health is less than clear. 21,22 A systematic review found that, in a pooled analysis, rainwater was associated with a reduced risk of illness compared with unimproved sources. 23 Comparing distance measurement methods.…”

Assessment of the microbiological quality of recreational waters: indicators and methods

“…Although an indicator should be correlated with the presence of pathogens and have a similar survival profile to the ones it detects, sometimes the FIB concentrations are not always correlated with the concentration of pathogens. Some studies have demonstrated a low or absent correlation with the presence of pathogenic forms, e.g., protozoan parasites and enteric viruses, virions, endospores, (oo)cysts (Wu et al 2011), and a variable degree of correlation with viral and zoonotic pathogens (Ahmed et al 2010). This issue is generally attributed to the widely differing physiology, phylogeny and ecology of FIB and pathogens.…”

Rainwater Harvesting Typologies for UK Houses: A Multi Criteria Analysis of System Configurations

“…Unlike some fully off-grid configurations implemented elsewhere [3,4], system configurations in the UK are supplemented by mains water supplies for potable water applications such as drinking, bathing and dishwashing. Germany has seen strong uptake of RWH technologies as reported by Partzsch [5] with 80,000 installations per annum and a total industry value of 340 million Euros.…”