2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health risk assessment in urban parks soils contaminated by metals, Rio Grande city (Brazil) case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present work, accidental ingestion of soil particles has been prioritised as the most relevant route of exposure, considering the tendency of children to play in contact with the soil and to place objects and their hands in their mouths. Several studies have shown that ingestion is the route that contributes the most to the estimation of risk in a recreational setting, while the influence of dust inhalation and dermal contact can be considered insignificant (De Miguel et al 2012Dudka and Miller 1999;Han et al 2020;Izquierdo-Díaz et al 2015;Penteado et al 2021). The dose received through soil intake (Is) is mathematically calculated with the following expression:…”
Section: Study Area and Definition Of The Risk Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present work, accidental ingestion of soil particles has been prioritised as the most relevant route of exposure, considering the tendency of children to play in contact with the soil and to place objects and their hands in their mouths. Several studies have shown that ingestion is the route that contributes the most to the estimation of risk in a recreational setting, while the influence of dust inhalation and dermal contact can be considered insignificant (De Miguel et al 2012Dudka and Miller 1999;Han et al 2020;Izquierdo-Díaz et al 2015;Penteado et al 2021). The dose received through soil intake (Is) is mathematically calculated with the following expression:…”
Section: Study Area and Definition Of The Risk Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https: //www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/toxics11070574/s1, Table S1: Pollution grade of heavy metal accumulation index; Table S2: Soil pollution risk screening value of agricultural land; Table S3: Graded evaluation of heavy metal pollution index; Table S4: Toxicity Correspondence Coefficient of Required Heavy Metal; Table S5: Hierarchical evaluation of potential ecological risks of heavy metals; Table S6: Related guideline values of heavy metal concentration (mg/kg); Table S7: Definition and reference of some parameters for health risk assessment of heavy metal in soils; Table S8: Reference dose (RfD, mg/(kg d)) and slope factor (SF, (kg d)/mg) of toxic elements for health risk assessment. ; Table S9: The hazard index of PTEs in the soil around Chengchao Iron Mine; Table S10: The hazard index of PTEs in the soil around ancient copper mine; [51][52][53][54][55][56][57] are cited in the Supplementary Materials.…”
Section: Supplementary Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, many nations lack their own national health risk assessment procedures and most of the studies conducted to date have instead relied heavily on the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) model and parameters [16]. Many studies have effectively assessed the human health risk posed by HMs in polluted soils using the USEPA approach, including those conducted in Poland [17], China [18], Chad, Africa [19], India [20], Turkey [21] and Brazil [22]. In addition, spatial distribution and heterogeneity of pollution status can also be assessed in great detail when these data are integrated with geographic information system technology (GIS) [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%