2012
DOI: 10.1308/003588412x13171221498749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health-related quality of life, surgical and aesthetic outcomes following microvascular free flap reconstructions: an 8-year institutional review

Abstract: Patients undergoing uncomplicated free flap surgery and those reporting superior post-operative flap aesthesis have higher HRQoL scores. Microvascular free tissue transfer has revolutionised our approach to the reconstruction of complex defects, providing a safe, reliable procedure to restore functionality and quality of life for patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, evidence indicates that timely re-exploration significantly increases the rate of compromised flap salvage; thus, close postoperative monitoring is necessary in order to detect early signs of deterioration and to revise if necessary [ 2 , 3 ]. The risk of a total loss following free microvascular tissue transfer is approximately 2–6%, mainly due to thrombotic events in the flow area of the microanastomosis [ 4 , 5 ]. A wealth of objective and subjective monitoring procedures have been reported in the past, but the current gold standard in monitoring flap perfusion is still based on a subjective clinical bedside assessment [ 1 , 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, evidence indicates that timely re-exploration significantly increases the rate of compromised flap salvage; thus, close postoperative monitoring is necessary in order to detect early signs of deterioration and to revise if necessary [ 2 , 3 ]. The risk of a total loss following free microvascular tissue transfer is approximately 2–6%, mainly due to thrombotic events in the flow area of the microanastomosis [ 4 , 5 ]. A wealth of objective and subjective monitoring procedures have been reported in the past, but the current gold standard in monitoring flap perfusion is still based on a subjective clinical bedside assessment [ 1 , 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The functionality of the foot was assessed based on American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society–Ankle and Hindfoot Score (AOFAS-AHS) 4 every 6 months till 2 years, and patient satisfaction concerning aesthetics was graded on a visual analog scale of 0 to 10. 3 5 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While 4.8% (10/207) were pharyngeal defects after resection for hypopharyngeal cancers, 2.4% (5/207) were lateral skull and neck defect (2 patients were following resection for fungating parotid/skin cancer, 1 patient for fungating ear cancer, 1 patient post electric shock temporal region skull defect and another 1 patient was post traumatic necrotic tissue loss of skull and upper posterior part of neck), 1.4% (3/207) were of maxillary defect following surgery for maxillary cancer and lastly one patient received 2 free flaps subsequently for mid facial defect following resection for aneurysm bone tumour of the face. Among the oral defect the most common defect was following resection for gingivobuccal mucosa cancer (50), followed by alveolus cancer (45), tongue cancer (30), floor of mouth cancer (15), ameloblastoma (11), oral cancer with skin involvement of through and through defect (11), cancer of lip (8), cancer of retro molar trigone (9), cancer of palate (2), giant cell tumour (GCT) of mandible (1) and lastly 4 patients of erythroleukoplakia. The study investigates the flap survival rate and look detail into the flap vascular complications individually.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 Advancement in microvascular surgical technique have brought about a revolution in head and neck reconstructive surgery; as re-vascularized tissue of requirement can be harvested to tailor fit any complex composite defect created after ablative radical resection with the most optimal functional outcome and excellent aesthetic. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Thus many head and neck cancers what were termed inoperable earlier, have become operable today with the possibility of reconstruction. This results in better survival as it allows require radical resection for advance head and neck malignancy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%