2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2009.01303.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health‐related quality of life assessment in randomised controlled trials in multiple myeloma: a critical review of methodology and impact on treatment recommendations

Abstract: Objectives:  Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) often have pronounced symptoms and substantially reduced quality of life. The aims of treatment are to control disease, maximise quality of life and prolong survival. Hence, health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) should be an important end‐point in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in addition to traditional endpoints. We wanted to evaluate whether trials reporting HRQOL outcomes have influenced clinical decision making and whether HRQOL was assessed robustly … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…18 These principles were also applied in a review of randomized trials that evaluated HRQoL when testing therapies for patients with multiple myeloma. 19 Kvam et al identified 15 trials and reported that in only 2 trials were efficacy and HRQoL outcomes discordant. 19 Segeren et al compared ASCT with chemotherapy alone and observed superior response rates and time-toprogression outcomes in those undergoing ASCT, 20 but did not detect improvements in event-free survival or OS; HRQoL was worse in those undergoing ASCT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…18 These principles were also applied in a review of randomized trials that evaluated HRQoL when testing therapies for patients with multiple myeloma. 19 Kvam et al identified 15 trials and reported that in only 2 trials were efficacy and HRQoL outcomes discordant. 19 Segeren et al compared ASCT with chemotherapy alone and observed superior response rates and time-toprogression outcomes in those undergoing ASCT, 20 but did not detect improvements in event-free survival or OS; HRQoL was worse in those undergoing ASCT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Kvam et al identified 15 trials and reported that in only 2 trials were efficacy and HRQoL outcomes discordant. 19 Segeren et al compared ASCT with chemotherapy alone and observed superior response rates and time-toprogression outcomes in those undergoing ASCT, 20 but did not detect improvements in event-free survival or OS; HRQoL was worse in those undergoing ASCT. Although potentially supporting a transplantation strategy, the investigators recommended against adoption of their ASCT preparative regimen, which included total body irradiation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An impact of QoL questionnaires on the outcome of myeloma patients has been confirmed in another study (SUMMIT) evaluating 202 patients with resistant/refractory MM treated with proteasome inhibitor bortezomib. Patients enrolled received four questionnaires (EORTC, QLQ C30, QLQ MY24 e FACT GOG Ntx [24,[28][29][30][31]) at different time points. QoL scores obtained were not only associated with survival, but also with response to treatment, while reported QoL progressively declined in patients with progressive disease [32].…”
Section: Pro In Hematological Malignanciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systematic incorporation of HRQoL measures into clinical trials allows for a comparison of treatment arms that includes the patients' perspective. A review study of showed that there are few randomized clinical trials in MM that include HRQoL as a study end-point [15]. HOVON 49 is, to our knowledge, the first phase III randomized multicenter trial comparing the efficacy of MP vs. MPT combined with a HRQoL assessment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%