Health-related quality of life and glycaemic control among adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes – a nationwide cross-sectional study

Abstract

Background Health-related quality of life and glycaemic control are some of the central outcomes in clinical diabetes care and research. The purpose of this study was to describe the health-related quality of life and assess its association with glycaemic control in adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in a nationwide setting. Methods In this cross-sectional survey, people with type 1 ( n = 2479) and type 2 diabetes ( n = 2469) were selected at random without replacement from the Swedish National Diabetes Register. Eligibility criteria were being aged 18–80 years with at least one registered test of glycated haemoglobin (HbA 1c ) the last 12 months. The generic 36-item Short Form version 2 (SF-36v2) was answered by 1373 (55.4%) people with type 1 diabetes and 1353 (54.8%) with type 2 diabetes. Results Correlation analyses showed weak correlations between scores on the SF-36v2 and glycaemic control for both diabetes types. After the participants were divided into three groups based on their levels of HbA 1c , multivariate regression analyses adjusted for demographics, other risk factors and diabetes complications showed that among participants with type 1 diabetes, the high-risk group (≥70 mmol/mol/8.6%) had statistically significantly lower means in five out of eight domains of the SF-36v2 and the mental component summary measure, as compared with the well-controlled group (< 52 mmol/mol/6.9%). Among the participants with type 2 diabetes, the high-risk group had the lowest statistically significantly means in seven domains and both summary measures. Conclusions Among people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, adults with high-risk HbA 1c levels have lower levels of health-related quality of life in most but not all domains of the SF-36v2. This finding was not explained by demographics, other risk factors, or diabetes complications. The weak individual-level correlations between HRQOL scores and levels of glycaemic control argues for the need to not focus exclusively on either HbA 1c levels or HRQOL scores but rather on both because both are important parts of a complex, life-long, challenging condition. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12955-019-1212-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Upper extremity impairments in type 1 diabetes in comparison to matched controls without diabetes : associations to the IGF-system, metabolic factors, disability and quality of life

“…Glycemic control (HbA1c) seemed to affect the perceived HRQOL (in all dimensions, except role-emotional and mental health); however, the impact was rather small, which is consistent with the findings of a recent study 132 . Several earlier studies have not been able to determine a relationship between HbA1c levels and HRQOL 133,134 .…”

Quality of life after gastric bypass surgery in patients with type 2 diabetes: patients’ experiences during 2 years of follow-up

“…This may contribute to an increased risk for psychosocial problems post-operatively. In our study, the participants scored lower mental health in comparison with what was found in a study among patients withT2D in Sweden [22].…”

New Diabetes Questionnaire to add patients’ perspectives to diabetes care for adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: nationwide cross-sectional study of construct validity assessing associations with generic health-related quality of life and clinical variables

“…7 15 Both questionnaires were answered by 1373 (55.4%) individuals with type 1 diabetes and 1353 (54.8%) with type 2 diabetes. 15 With small differences in response rate depending on the questionnaires in question, the sample has been described as previously focusing on the scale development of the Diabetes Questionnaire 7 and separate analyses of the SF-36v2 data. 15 Age, sex and clinical variables (diabetes type defined by clinical diagnosis, diabetes duration, HbA 1c level, cardiovascular risk factors, complications, physical activity level and receipt of medical treatment) recorded because of their relevance to high-quality diabetes care were collected from the NDR.…”