Health-related marketing messages on product labels of commercial infant and toddler food packaging in Australia: a cross-sectional audit

Abstract

BackgroundProper nutrition in early childhood is essential to ensure optimal growth and development. Use of ‘better-for-you’ features on food packaging position products as healthier for children. This study aims to systematically explore the use of better-for-you labelling on infant and toddler food packaging.MethodsA cross-sectional audit of health and nutrition claims, text and images used as ‘better-for-you’ features present on infant and toddler food packaging. Data on infant and toddler food packaging were collected from five large grocery stores in Adelaide, Australia in 2019. The content of 282 unique commercial products (n=215 infant foods, n=67 toddler foods) were analysed for explicit and implicit features positioning them as better-for-you, including health and nutrition claims as well as text and images representing ‘natural.’ResultsAt least one feature of better-for-you positioning was identified on all food packaging coded. All products had characteristics coded as ‘natural’. Almost one-fifth (17%) of the products included statements in addition to mandatory allergen labelling that their products were ‘free from’ certain allergens, or gluten. One-third of the labels had statements related to enhancing development of taste, oro-motor skills and other aspects of childhood development. Of the fruit and vegetable-based infant foods displaying a sugar statement suggesting a low sugar content, 85% were sweetened with fruit puree.ConclusionsThe use of better-for-you features on infant and toddler food packaging is common and pervasive. Allergen-free and developmental claims are being used to position infant and toddler foods as better-for-you. Regulation of toddler food products separately from adult food is required, as is tighter regulation of the appropriate use of sugar and fruit puree statements on infant and toddler food packaging.

Does Food Intake of Australian Toddlers 12–24 Months Align with Recommendations: Findings from the Australian Feeding Infants and Toddlers Study (OzFITS) 2021

“…For the highest quartile of the older toddlers, discretionary foods contributed up to one-quarter of daily energy intake, increasing the risk of obesity and displacement of other food groups in the diet. Commercial toddler foods marketed as healthy snacks in Australia [ 33 ] may be driving this as they were the most common foods consumed during snacking.…”

Effects of marketing claims on toddler food products on parents’ product preferences, perceptions and purchasing intentions: an online experiment

“…It seems that claims stating that an otherwise unhealthy product is free of one negative attribute mislead consumers to assign a more favourable overall evaluation to a product, even though it is high in nutrients of concern such as sugar, salt and saturated fat. As these influential ‘free from "bad" nutrients/ingredients’ claims are the most common types of claims appearing on infant and toddler foods in Australian supermarkets [ 11 , 14 , 34 ], their consumer reach and impact is likely to be widespread.…”

Benchmarking the nutrient composition and labelling practices of commercially produced ready‐to‐eat purées and meals for older infants and young children across seven Southeast Asian countries

“…Thus, decreasing early exposure to salty tasting foods is recommended to reduce salt intake later in life (Lava et al, 2015;Liem, 2017 Claims on CPCF purées/meals labels were widely prevalent, with compositional claims being the most commonly displayed. Extensive use of claims has been also noted on CPCF products available in the United Kingdom (Garcia et al, 2022), Australia (Simmonds et al, 2021) and Taiwan (Koo et al, 2018). Claims tend to emphasize the natural and organic nature of CPCF purées/meals, as well as the absence of artificial additions or other components often considered by consumers as less desirable, such as added sugar and salt.…”