2022
DOI: 10.1080/09638237.2021.2022608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health professionals’ perspectives on shared decision-making in secondary mental healthcare: a qualitative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were examples of jargon as well as acronyms being used; both can render the care plan template inaccessible and may be examples of where the principles around shared decision making are not met through access to information being denied [38]. Lin, Renwick [39] found that clinicians were not consistently familiar with shared decision making, requiring additional training. The care plan template, in this instance, can be a 'nudge' (without forbidding options or changing incentives [40]) to changing practice, and it behoves us to consider the most appropriate clinician in working on developing the care plan template.…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were examples of jargon as well as acronyms being used; both can render the care plan template inaccessible and may be examples of where the principles around shared decision making are not met through access to information being denied [38]. Lin, Renwick [39] found that clinicians were not consistently familiar with shared decision making, requiring additional training. The care plan template, in this instance, can be a 'nudge' (without forbidding options or changing incentives [40]) to changing practice, and it behoves us to consider the most appropriate clinician in working on developing the care plan template.…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 99%