2011
DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2011.604392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health Literacy Measurement: A Proposed Research Agenda

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
142
0
8

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
142
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Theoretical frameworks that advance our understanding of health literacy and how it relates to health-service use and health outcomes are clearly needed (Pleasant et al, 2011). Theoretical frameworks provide the necessary basis for reliable measurement and the development of interventions to improve health literacy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Theoretical frameworks that advance our understanding of health literacy and how it relates to health-service use and health outcomes are clearly needed (Pleasant et al, 2011). Theoretical frameworks provide the necessary basis for reliable measurement and the development of interventions to improve health literacy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pleasant, McKinney, and Rickard (2011) indicated that there is a lack of true theoretical frameworks that explain health literacy. Theory should be the foundation for developing reliable and valid measures of health literacy, which will allow the field to better study and understand the role of health literacy in health behavior change.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The multiple issues that were identified in regards to the measurement of HL have been reported elsewhere [56,57] but have yet to be addressed in research examining HL and TDM.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future research may benefit from the consideration, or incorporation, of Pleasant and colleagues [56] recommendations that the measurement of HL should: (1) be "explicitly built on a testable theory or conceptual framework of health literacy"; (2) explore core literacy skills (i.e., reading, writing, numeracy, speaking, and listening); (3) "measure on a continual, not a categorical basis"; (4) treat health literacy as a 'latent construct'; (5) honour the principle of compatibility (i.e., use measures appropriate for the setting); and (6) "allow comparisons to be commensurate across contexts" [56 (p15-17) ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%