Health Literacy Impact on National Healthcare Utilization and Expenditure

Abstract

Background: Health literacy presents an enormous challenge in the delivery of effective healthcare and quality outcomes. We evaluated the impact of low health literacy (LHL) on healthcare utilization and healthcare expenditure. Methods: Database analysis used Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) from 2005-2008 which provides nationally representative estimates of healthcare utilization and expenditure. Health literacy scores (HLSs) were calculated based on a validated, predictive model and were scored according to the National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NAAL). HLS ranged from 0-500. Health literacy level (HLL) and categorized in 2 groups: Below basic or basic (HLS <226) and above basic (HLS ≥226). Healthcare utilization expressed as a physician, nonphysician, or emergency room (ER) visits and healthcare spending. Expenditures were adjusted to 2010 rates using the Consumer Price Index (CPI). A P value of 0.05 or less was the criterion for statistical significance in all analyses. Multivariate regression models assessed the impact of the predicted HLLs on outpatient healthcare utilization and expenditures. All analyses were performed with SAS and STATA ® 11.0 statistical software. Results: The study evaluated 22 599 samples representing 503 374 648 weighted individuals nationally from [2005][2006][2007][2008]. The cohort had an average age of 49 years and included more females (57%). Caucasian were the predominant racial ethnic group (83%) and 37% of the cohort were from the South region of the United States of America. The proportion of the cohort with basic or below basic health literacy was 22.4%. Annual predicted values of physician visits, nonphysician visits, and ER visits were 6.6, 4.8, and 0.2, respectively, for basic or below basic compared to 4.4, 2.6, and 0.1 for above basic. Predicted values of office and ER visits expenditures were $1284 and $151, respectively, for basic or below basic and $719 and $100 for above basic (P < .05). The extrapolated national estimates show that the annual costs for prescription alone for adults with LHL possibly associated with basic and below basic health literacy could potentially reach about $172 billion. Conclusion: Health literacy is inversely associated with healthcare utilization and expenditure. Individuals with below basic or basic HLL have greater healthcare utilization and expendituresspending more on prescriptions compared to individuals with above basic HLL. Public health strategies promoting appropriate education among individuals with LHL may help to improve health outcomes and reduce unnecessary healthcare visits and costs. Implications for policy makers• Health literacy presents an enormous challenge in the delivery of effective healthcare and quality outcomes. •We found that individuals with below basic or basic compared to above basic health literacy incurred more healthcare visits, have greater total healthcare expenditures. • Adults with basic or below basic health literacy incurred greater costs for prescription ($3362) than adults w...

Health literacy and health outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

“…HL has been found to be inversely associated with healthcare utilization and expenditure [10e12, 25,29,30]. We found that this was also true for COPD, since those with inadequate HL suffered more comorbidities, had more visits to emergency departments and hospital admissions and were more dependent ( Table 2).…”

Data-driven maternal health literacy promotion and a postscript on its implications

“…Since low health-related literacy is considered to be pervasive and unmodifiable short of reforming education systems, research has generally ignored empowerment. Rather, patients' low literacy has been posited as an explanation for inequities and disparities, low quality, [2] poor outcomes [6], and high costs [25]. This deficit approach is disempowering to all concerned.…”

Effects of eHealth Literacy on General Practitioner Consultations: A Mediation Analysis

“…Rasu et al [28] agree that high literacy likely goes along with higher use of preventive care and thus, in the long run, with lower utilization; however, upward they point out that the correlation can also be explained by the increasing use of electronic media such as the Internet to help manage symptoms and conditions.…”