Health insurance and health system (un) responsiveness: a qualitative study with elderly in rural Tanzania

Abstract

Background Health insurance (HI) has increasingly been accepted as a mechanism to facilitate access to healthcare in low and middle-income countries. However, health insurance members, especially those in Sub-Saharan Africa, have reported a low responsiveness in health systems. This study aimed to explore the experiences and perceptions of healthcare services from the perspective of insured and uninsured elderly in rural Tanzania. Method An explanatory qualitative study was conducted in the rural districts of Igunga and Nzega, located in western-central Tanzania. Eight focus group discussions were carried out with 78 insured and uninsured elderly men and women who were purposely selected because they were 60 years of age or older and had utilised healthcare services in the past 12 months prior to the study. The interview questions were inspired by the domains of health systems’ responsiveness. Qualitative content analysis was used to analyse the data. Results Elderly participants appreciated that HI had facilitated the access to healthcare and protected them from certain costs. But they also complained that HI had failed to provide equitable access due to limited service benefits and restricted use of services within schemes. Although elderly perspectives varied widely across the domains of responsiveness, insured individuals generally expressed dissatisfaction with their healthcare. Conclusions The national health insurance policy should be revisited in order to improve its implementation and expand the scope of service coverage. Strategic decisions are required to improve the healthcare infrastructure, increase the number of healthcare workers, ensure the availability of medicines and testing facilities at healthcare centers, and reduce long administrative procedures related to HI. A continuous training plan for healthcare workers focused on patients´ communication skills and care rights is highly recommended.

Strengthening financial management systems at primary health care: Performance assessment of the Facility Financial Accounting and Reporting System (FFARS) in Tanzania

“…Health insurance coverage is also low. By December 2019, the National Health Insurance Fund covered 9% of the population (an increase from 2% approximately 20 years ago) while the improved Community Health Fund was reported to have reached a coverage of 23% of households (11,12). However, a recent review has indicated that active membership, donating households with an active insurance policy, by April 2021 was only 3% (13).…”

Informal Support Networks of Tanzanians With Chronic Diseases: Predictors of Support Provision and Treatment Adherence

“…Informal social support fills this gap in social health protection, indicating that health insurance does not adequately protect people with NCDs from the economic consequences of their disease. Interventions and efforts to scale up and improve the utility of health insurance should thus consider the social support structure of beneficiaries and patients and that the needs of patients with NCDs often cannot be met by existing benefits packages ( 16 , 56 ). Furthermore, the provision of even non-material support represents an opportunity cost for informal caregivers whereby key caregivers may experience a high burden of support responsibilities with implications upon their own health and socioeconomic conditions ( 44 ).…”

Does Awareness Matter for the Improved Community Health Fund? Evidence from Street Vendors in Dodoma City, Tanzania

“…The available studies in the context of Tanzania have mainly examined the health insurance schemes with the experience from the elderly (Tungu, et al, 2020;Amani, et al, 2020;Amani, et al, 2021). Thus, there is a lack of evidence about the improved CHF and the enhancement of health service delivery from the perspective of street vendors in Tanzania.…”