2013
DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health Information Exchange Improves Identification Of Frequent Emergency Department Users

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study and previous work 53,54 confirm that integrating data across health care systems provides novel insights about population-level, as opposed to simply site-specific, health care utilization patterns.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This study and previous work 53,54 confirm that integrating data across health care systems provides novel insights about population-level, as opposed to simply site-specific, health care utilization patterns.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…30 State and federal programs have increasingly looked to HIE networks to improve communication between unaffiliated providers. 17 This is important for frequent ED users with epilepsy because data collected from a single medical center may notably underestimate ED use, 14 and people with epilepsy often visit multiple centers. 15 Our work demonstrates that data collected by HIE networks can support accurate predictions.…”
Section: One-variable Model a One-variable Logistic Regression Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studying frequent ED use is challenging, in part because people often use multiple EDs for care. 14,15 Health information exchange (HIE) networks allow users to view medical information in the electronic health records of multiple unaffiliated institutions, creating a more complete record than possible from a single center's data. 14 These technologies are increasingly available, 16,17 and may provide a data source to describe and predict frequent ED use.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Canadian survey data from 2006-2014 demonstrate that in six provinces the Canadian iEHR is perceived to have positive outcomes in terms of user satisfaction, impact on quality of care, and impact on productivity [15]. [1] In the ED setting in other jurisdictions, these type of read-only iEHR's have been shown to be valued by physicians [2][22], and to increase the ability to identify frequent ED users [23]. Usage of iEHR's has been reported to vary across different practice settings even when the technical configuration is identical [24], potentially resulting in inconsistent and poorly understood clinical impacts [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%