Health, Hope, and Harmony: A Systematic Review of the Determinants of Happiness across Cultures and Countries

Abstract

The aim of this study was to review the literature on what constitutes happiness across cultures and countries to advance scholarly knowledge on the happiness construct. A systematic review was conducted to examine the determinants of happiness in samples across cultures and countries. Five different databases, including APA PsycNet, EBSCO-Academic, EBSCO-Business, Project MUSE, and Google Scholar, grey literature, and in-text references from relevant review articles were used. A total of 155 articles were included in the review, encompassing studies from over 100 countries and 44 cultures. Myriad determinants of happiness were found that were placed into three broad categories labeled Health, Hope, and Harmony. The predominant happiness determinants were mental, emotional, and physical well-being, a purposeful holistic work–life balance, nurturing social relationships, caring for self and others, and being in harmony with one’s culture, traditions, community, religion, and environment. This study engendered an “Integrated Model of the Determinants of Happiness” to provide a universally applicable conceptualization of the happiness construct. By examining studies on determinants of happiness across the globe in the past 90 years, this review uncovered that happiness constitutes multiple determinants that fall under three major categories: ‘Health’, ‘Hope’, and ‘Harmony.’

Demographic determinants of happiness in Andalusia: insights from the 2022 social survey data

“…In summary, the study coincides with a large part of the consulted literature, where the complexity of happiness as an individual experience is highlighted (see the review by ( 44 )). In this regard, any social intervention must take into account the complexity of the construct itself.…”

Measurement of flourishing: a scoping review

“…Flourishing scales are also multi-dimensional in nature, with several items and individual subscale scores to measure such dimensions. This makes them different from most life satisfaction measures and some happiness measures, which are often limited to a single item or a series of single-item dimensions, that are ultimately also multidimensionally determined (Jovanović and Lazić, 2020 ; Singh et al, 2023 ). Relatedly, flourishing scales all emphasize functioning in multiple aspects of everyday life (eudaimonia), including psychological, social, and—for certain scales—physical functioning.…”

Impact of integrated treatment of hepatitis C on happiness among people who inject drugs: results from the INTRO-HCV.

“…31 The integrated and standard treatment groups demonstrated substantial intraindividual variation in levels of happiness over time. Considering happiness as an emotional state linked to one´s physiological reactions to life events, 5 it can be assumed that the intra-individual variations in the present study might be attributable to comorbidities and complexities among substance users. 7,10,14 Nevertheless, future research should examine possible causes of the changes in happiness scores not only in SUD patients with HCV, but in other populations as well.…”

“…4 A decrease in happiness could be caused by the determinants of physical and mental health such as depression, poor perception of health and addiction in general population. 5,6 The level of happiness is lower in patients with chronic diseases, such as patients with psoriasis who report 53 out of 100 7 or multiple sclerosis, 46 out of 100. 8 Patients with substance use disorders (SUD) are also at high risk of being unhappy.…”