Health financing and family planning in the context of Universal Health Care: Connecting the discourse

Appleford, Gabrielle; RamaRao, Saumya

doi:10.31899/rh6.1021

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 17 publications

(19 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Service exemption schemes for MCH, such as those in Sahelian countries, may also fail to include family planning as part of a continuum of care. 10 , 18 Even when family planning is included in a benefits package or service exemption scheme, this may not translate to provision. A seven-country study of health insurance schemes 19 concluded that despite the formal inclusion of family planning services in the national benefits packages examined, actual integration of these services faced challenges, with implications for the availability of family planning services in practice.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The inclusion of sexual and reproductive health services within universal health care through intentional design

Appleford¹,

RamaRao

Bellows

2020

Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, we argue that how sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services are included in UHC and health financing matters, and that this has implications for universality and equity. This is a matter of rights, given the differential health risks that women face, including unwanted pregnancy. How traditional vertical SRH services are compensated under UHC also matters and should balance incentives for efficiency with incentives for appropriate provision using the rights-based approach to user-centred care so that risks of sub-optimal outcomes are mitigated. This suggests that as UHC benefits packages are designed, there is need for the SRH community to advocate for more than simple "SRH inclusion". This paper describes a practical approach to integrate quality of SRH care within the UHC agenda using a framework called the "5Ps". The framework emphasises a "systems" and "design" lens as important steps to quality. The framework can be applied at different scales, from the health system to the individual user level. It also pays attention to how financing and resource policies intended to promote UHC may support or undermine the respect, protection and fulfilment of SRH and rights. The framework was originally developed with a specific emphasis on quality provision of family planning. In this paper, we have extended it to cover other SRH services.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Polity: why purchase The framework was originally developed with a specific emphasis on the quality provision of family planning. 9,10 In this paper, we have extended it to cover other SRH services. Following the framework (Table 1), we describe how the different elements of purchasing may influence quality of SRH care.…”

Section: Findings 5ps Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

The inclusion of sexual and reproductive health services within universal health care through intentional design

Appleford¹,

RamaRao

Bellows

2020

Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…On family planning, Marshall 33 postulates that in some countries, religion plays a factor in government's choices of implementing certain family planning policies and reforms above others. Family planning may also be more frequently excluded given the high levels of donor dependency (especially for financing commodities) 34 and low cofinancing requirements. 35 36 Finally, information required to prioritising a wide range of interventions may not have been as widely available for older HBPs.…”

Section: 6mentioning

confidence: 99%

The journey to UHC: how well are vertical programmes integrated in the health benefits package? A scoping review

Regan¹,

Wilson

Chalkidou

et al. 2021

BMJ Glob Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundCountries are recommended to progressively work towards universal health coverage (UHC), and to make explicit choices regarding the expansion of priority services. However, there is little guidance on how to manage the inclusion of vertical programmes, funded by external partners, in health benefits packages (HBP) in low and middle-income countries (LMICs).ObjectiveWe conducted a scoping review to map the inclusion of six vertical programmes (HIV, tuberculosis, malaria, maternal and child health, contraceptives, immunisation) in 26 LMICs.MethodsWe identified 26 LMICs with an HBP that was not aspirational (eg, with evidence of implementation or funding). For each HBP, we collected information on the corresponding UHC scheme, health financing at the time of establishment, revisions since inception and entitlements. For each vertical programme, we developed a list of tracer interventions based on the Disease Control Priorities 3 and the 100 Core Health Indicators List. We then used this list of tracer interventions to map the coverage of the six vertical programmes.ResultsThe review shows that there is no common starting point for countries embarking into UHC. Some HBPs were almost three decades old. Whole package revisions are rare. The inclusion of vertical programme does not follow a given pattern based on health financing indicators or country’s income group. Maternal child health services are the most often included and family planning the least. Six countries in our sample covered all vertical programmes, while one covered only one of six.ConclusionsThis review has shown that there has been a long history of countries facing this question and we have provided the first mapping of inclusion of vertical programmes in UHC. The results of the mapping can inform decisions in countries embarking in UHC.

show abstract

“… 12 , 35 However, the funding landscape is changing, with uncertainty in the continuity of donor funding and increasing expectation for LMICs to financially sustain their own health services, such as through national health insurance schemes. 36 , 37 Advocating for sufficient investment for widescale provision of PPFP counseling and PPIUD provision is hindered by a limited number of studies and a consequent gap in the evidence base on the cost-effectiveness of these approaches.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Economic Evaluation of Provision of Postpartum Intrauterine Device Services in Bangladesh and Tanzania

Eva

Gold

Makins

et al. 2021

Glob Health Sci Pract

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Health financing and family planning in the context of Universal Health Care: Connecting the discourse

Cited by 4 publications

References 17 publications

The inclusion of sexual and reproductive health services within universal health care through intentional design

The inclusion of sexual and reproductive health services within universal health care through intentional design

The journey to UHC: how well are vertical programmes integrated in the health benefits package? A scoping review

Economic Evaluation of Provision of Postpartum Intrauterine Device Services in Bangladesh and Tanzania

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About