2015
DOI: 10.1080/17538068.2015.1107308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health communication research in the digital age: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, like any meta-level analysis that aggregates previous research, is the sampling method used to select studies for analysis is necessarily bounded. While the two databases used, PsycNET and Communication and Mass Media Complete, have been similarly used in previous research (Cummings & Bailenson, 2016;Hu, 2015), they may not represent the entire scope of social scientific VR research that exists today. Along similar lines, only journals with APA formatting were included, which was necessary to obtain test statistics that are less consistently reported in alternative formats.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, like any meta-level analysis that aggregates previous research, is the sampling method used to select studies for analysis is necessarily bounded. While the two databases used, PsycNET and Communication and Mass Media Complete, have been similarly used in previous research (Cummings & Bailenson, 2016;Hu, 2015), they may not represent the entire scope of social scientific VR research that exists today. Along similar lines, only journals with APA formatting were included, which was necessary to obtain test statistics that are less consistently reported in alternative formats.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, user-posted content does not go through any rigorous fact-checking process, making room for misinformation to take advantage of such a situation. During the 2016 Zika epidemic, despite the CDC’s prominent web presence and efforts, inaccurate information regarding Zika proliferated on social media and outperformed CDC (and other legitimate sources such as the World Health Organization [WHO]) by a large margin [ 7 ]. Uncertainty about the root cause and transmission route of this virus gave room for the proliferation of rumors and misinformation [ 19 , 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals, especially young adult minority women, have become more sophisticated in their health information seeking, and have a heightened awareness of the importance of credibility (Moran et al, 2016 ). Health communication strategies in the digital age need to incorporate credibility cues that permit access to medical expertise online (Hu, 2015 ; Ruppel & Rains, 2012 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%