2014
DOI: 10.18043/ncm.75.4.231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health Care Utilization From Chemotherapy-Related Adverse Events Among Low-Income Breast Cancer Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After recalculating these rates to permit comparison across studies, 7% to 12% of the patients in the study evaluating all cancers had an ED visit, 33 followed by 5% to 12% of gynecological cancer patients, 29,35 2% to 10% of colon cancer patients, 27,31,37 3% to 5% of prostate cancer patients, 28,41 4% of lung cancer patients, 37 and 1% to 2% of breast cancer patients. 32,34,37 Using the 30-day visit rate, studies that examined postsurgical periods demonstrated 2% to 12% of the sample visited an ED within 30 days after surgery, 27–2,31 and the study that examined only chemotherapy showed a 5% 30-day visit rate. 35 Those that examined the period after diagnosis had between 1% and 12% 30-day ED visit rates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After recalculating these rates to permit comparison across studies, 7% to 12% of the patients in the study evaluating all cancers had an ED visit, 33 followed by 5% to 12% of gynecological cancer patients, 29,35 2% to 10% of colon cancer patients, 27,31,37 3% to 5% of prostate cancer patients, 28,41 4% of lung cancer patients, 37 and 1% to 2% of breast cancer patients. 32,34,37 Using the 30-day visit rate, studies that examined postsurgical periods demonstrated 2% to 12% of the sample visited an ED within 30 days after surgery, 27–2,31 and the study that examined only chemotherapy showed a 5% 30-day visit rate. 35 Those that examined the period after diagnosis had between 1% and 12% 30-day ED visit rates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38,40 Enabling factors associated with increased ED use were urban compared with rural residence, 36 residing in a state in which Medicaid copayments increased and prescription drug and other benefits were reduced, 33 and being unmarried compared with married. 36 Need factors that predicted increased ED use were having a radical prostatectomy compared with no treatment, 36 surviving at least 1 year from diagnosis, 40 having more severe symptoms, 39 having a greater number of comorbidities, 34,39,41 being eligible for Medicaid due to blindness or disability, 34 receiving chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy, 34 residing in a census tract with low median income, 36 and having no treatment compared with radiation therapy. 36 Cancer stage is also considered a need factor that could influence ED use; however, results for the impact of cancer stage were less consistent.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Programs to improve coordination of care between cancer care specialists and primary care providers are necessary and may help to improve outcomes and reduce costs. For example, in the original article by Goyal and colleagues [26], the authors explore the role of patient-centered medical homes in potentially reducing health care utilization associated with chemotherapy-related adverse events among breast cancer patients. Their study found that Medicaid patients had significantly fewer inpatient admissions associated with chemotherapy-related adverse events if they were enrolled in Community Care of North Carolina (CCNC), which uses a medical-home model to provide care, than if they were not enrolled in CCNC.…”
Section: Effects Of Cancer On Physical Health Mental Health and Finmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ICISS also exemplifies the wealth of health care research activities in North Carolina, which have the potential to inform policy and improve quality of care in and beyond the state. Notably, ICISS data were used for both of the original articles featured in this issue [7,26]. This table is available in its entirety in the online edition of the NCMJ.…”
Section: Special Issues In Cancer Research In North Carolinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have consistently demonstrated that individuals with a medical home benefit from improved quality of care in the treatment of chronic diseases, including diabetes and asthma [9,1618]. Further, medical homes improve outcomes for individuals who receive treatment for specialty-intensive conditions, including SMI [1921]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%