2023
DOI: 10.1016/s2542-5196(23)00169-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health-care systems' resource footprints and their access and quality in 49 regions between 1995 and 2015: an input–output analysis

Baptiste Andrieu,
Laurie Marrauld,
Olivier Vidal
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to France, whose Shift Project initiative is closest in methodology and scope to ours, we see that Geneva’s carbon footprint per capita is more than 16% higher, from 0.73 to 0.84 tCO 2 eq. These figures should be set in relation to the study by Andrieu et al published in 2023, which shows that the energy footprint of the Swiss healthcare system is more than three times larger than that of France [ 6 ]. In the UK, the per capita footprint is significantly lower than in Geneva.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared to France, whose Shift Project initiative is closest in methodology and scope to ours, we see that Geneva’s carbon footprint per capita is more than 16% higher, from 0.73 to 0.84 tCO 2 eq. These figures should be set in relation to the study by Andrieu et al published in 2023, which shows that the energy footprint of the Swiss healthcare system is more than three times larger than that of France [ 6 ]. In the UK, the per capita footprint is significantly lower than in Geneva.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficiency of the Swiss healthcare system, measured by the quality/energy footprint indicator, is below optimal standards, especially when compared to countries such as Sweden [ 6 ]. Sweden achieves a comparable quality of healthcare with an energy footprint of one-third, indicating potential for improvement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%