2017
DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1278202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health care resource utilization and costs of California Medicaid patients with schizophrenia treated with paliperidone palmitate once monthly or atypical oral antipsychotic treatment

Abstract: Patients with schizophrenia treated with PP1M had significantly fewer inpatient hospitalizations and associated costs with no significant difference in the total costs between the two cohorts. This study is subject to limitations associated with claims data such as miscoding, inability to examine clinical severity, etc.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
51
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(51 reference statements)
4
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In alignment with our results, Shah et al 17 also noted that patients prescribed LAIs had higher schizophrenia-related outpatient visits and more prescription fills, which can be explained by the frequent provider visits for LAI administration. Similar findings were discovered in other studies such as reduced risk of hospitalization and fewer inpatient days when comparing patients on PP1M vs OAAs [32][33][34] . The reduction in inpatient stays and LOS for PP1M patients is further supported by findings from a study by Lafeuille et al 9 , which found that, upon transitioning to PP1M from OAA, patients benefitted from a 36% relative risk reduction of hospitalization along with subsequent lower inpatient costs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In alignment with our results, Shah et al 17 also noted that patients prescribed LAIs had higher schizophrenia-related outpatient visits and more prescription fills, which can be explained by the frequent provider visits for LAI administration. Similar findings were discovered in other studies such as reduced risk of hospitalization and fewer inpatient days when comparing patients on PP1M vs OAAs [32][33][34] . The reduction in inpatient stays and LOS for PP1M patients is further supported by findings from a study by Lafeuille et al 9 , which found that, upon transitioning to PP1M from OAA, patients benefitted from a 36% relative risk reduction of hospitalization along with subsequent lower inpatient costs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Xiao et al 32 reported that, upon comparison of PP1M and OAA users, PP1M use was linked to significantly lower medical costs, which offset the higher pharmacy cost of PP1M. Similar findings were also revealed by Pesa et al 34 and Pilon et al 33 , who investigated patients recently diagnosed with schizophrenia. The lower medical costs for the PP1M cohorts in previous studies appeared to be driven by the significantly lower inpatient costs [32][33][34] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The observed increase in outpatient prescription costs may be attributed to the high cost of LAIs, which has been regarded as one of the most critical factors limiting clinical use of these drugs. However, previous real-world studies comparing healthcare utilization and costs between LAIs and OAT medications showed that high prescription costs are offset by reduced healthcare expenditure in patients treated with LAIs, suggesting that the use of PP may result in greater cost savings compared to the use of OAT medications [11,12,16]. Although the present study could not precisely quantify the costs of PP, we observed that a reduction in per patient per year admission costs (USD 1,220.75) could offset the increase in per patient per year prescription costs (USD 1,497.15) in PP-treated Korean patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant economic benefits of LAIs, due to the reductions in hospitalization rates, have recently been demonstrated in populations in the United States (US) and Europe [10][11][12][13]. Patients treated with PP had lower mean hospitalization costs (United States dollar [USD] 18,560) compared to those treated with OAT medications (USD 31,505) [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PP1M was shown to improve adherence and delay treatment failure compared to OAAs in a recent clinical trial [10]. Similarly, PP1M was shown to improve adherence and reduce economic burden compared to OAAs in the real world [6,8,[11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%