2019
DOI: 10.1097/jnc.0000000000000073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health Care Provider Perspectives on Pre-exposure Prophylaxis: A Qualitative Study

Abstract: Although pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) requires a prescription from a health care provider, we lack unanimity in guidelines for the identification of the ideal provider type to prescribe PrEP. The purpose of our study was to understand clinician perspectives on provider categories to determine who is best suited to prescribe this medication to HIV-uninfected patients. We conducted 28 in-depth interviews between September 2017 and January 2018 with current prescribers of PrEP. Qualitative findings indicated t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings confirm and extend the international literature on the 'purview paradox' 3,[21][22][23][24][25] in HIV care, with both explicit and implicit views communicated about which professionals are best qualified to delivery PrEP effectively. For example, despite relying on GPs to accept those PrEP referrals that sexual health clinics could no longer manage, sexual health clinicians were (often unfairly) sceptical of GP provision of PrEP, reproducing the long documented tendency to view HIV as an 'epidemic of complexities', 47 and a health condition best managed by those with extensive background in the area.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These findings confirm and extend the international literature on the 'purview paradox' 3,[21][22][23][24][25] in HIV care, with both explicit and implicit views communicated about which professionals are best qualified to delivery PrEP effectively. For example, despite relying on GPs to accept those PrEP referrals that sexual health clinics could no longer manage, sexual health clinicians were (often unfairly) sceptical of GP provision of PrEP, reproducing the long documented tendency to view HIV as an 'epidemic of complexities', 47 and a health condition best managed by those with extensive background in the area.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…31 However, the requirement that only doctors (and nurse practitioners) can prescribe in Australia means that sexual health nurses have ended up playing a more restricted role in PrEP provision than in demonstration studies. Although literature on the purview paradox has focussed on the division between primary care and specialist care, 3,[21][22][23][24][25] which we also found, our participants also described a tension between who is allowed to prescribe PrEP (doctors and nurse practitioners) and who is not (most sexual health nurses). Prescribing rights are important to consider as a different dimension of the purview paradox.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar findings have been seen in multiple settings in other studies as well. [22][23][24] Our PrEP interventions received significant support from nonprescribing clinic staff and trainees. The inclusion of multiple health care professions and ancillary support staff in this process is unique, but important to ensure widespread impact and ongoing success of PrEP in the homeless primary care setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, most PrEP outreach efforts in the United States have focused on men who have sex with men. A concerted public health approach can utilize multi-level efforts to educate the general community, potential candidates, and health care providers about PrEP (38). However, outreach is directly related to accessibility and affordability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%