Health Care Professionals’ Experiences and Perspectives on Using Telehealth for Home-based Palliative Care: Scoping Review

Abstract

Background Telehealth seems feasible for use in home-based palliative care (HBPC). It may improve access to health care professionals (HCPs) at patients’ homes, reduce hospital admissions, enhance patients’ feelings of security and safety, and increase the time spent at home for patients in HBPC. HBPC requires the involvement of various HCPs such as nurses, physicians, allied health professionals, dietitians, psychologists, religious counselors, and social workers. Acceptance of the use of technology among HCPs is essential for the successful delivery of telehealth in practice. No scoping review has mapped the experiences and perspectives of HCPs regarding the use of telehealth in HBPC. Objective The aim of this review was to systematically map published studies on HCPs’ experiences and perspectives on the use of telehealth in HBPC. Methods A scoping review was conducted using the methodology of Arksey and O’Malley. The review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews. A systematic search was performed in AMED, CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science for studies published in peer-reviewed journals between January 1, 2000, and August 23, 2022. The reference lists of the included papers were hand searched to identify additional studies. The inclusion criteria were (1) studies using qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods; (2) studies including HCPs using telehealth with patients in HBPC; (3) studies on HCPs’ experiences and perspectives on the use of telehealth in HBPC; (4) studies published between January 1, 2000, and August 23, 2022; and (5) studies published in English, Portuguese, Norwegian, Danish, Swedish, or Spanish. Pairs of authors independently included studies and extracted data. The first 2 stages of thematic synthesis were used to thematically organize the data. Results This scoping review included 29 papers from 28 studies. Four descriptive themes were identified: (1) easy to use but technological issues undermine confidence, (2) adds value but personal and organizational barriers challenge adoption, (3) potential to provide useful and meaningful patient-reported data, and (4) mutual trust as a prerequisite for interpersonal relationships. Conclusions Telehealth in HBPC seems to be easy to use and may improve the coordination of care, time efficiency, clinical assessments, and help build and enhance personal and professional relationships. However, the introduction of technology in HBPC is complex, as it may not align well with the overall aim of palliative care from HCPs’ point of view. Further, changes in practice and requirements for HCPs may reduce motivation for the use of telehealth in HBPC. HCPs consider themselves to have central roles in implementing telehealth, and a lack of acceptance and motivation is a key barrier to telehealth adoption. Policy makers and telehealth developers should be aware of this potential barrier when developing or implementing new technology for use in HBPC. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) RR2-10.2196/33305

Implementation of remote home care: assessment guided by the RE-AIM framework

“…A review found that the fear of burdening patients was the most frequent reason for gatekeeping behavior [ 31 ]. HCPs may be hesitant and concerned that welfare technology in home-based palliative care can have a negative effect on contact with patients and result in an increased focus on the patient physical problems [ 33 , 34 ], leaving the patient psychosocial, spiritual, and existential needs unattended. A prevailing opinion is that clinical care is either high-tech or high-touch, each considered antithetical to the other [ 7 ].…”

“…Palliative care is a complex practice that requires a wide range of competencies from those practicing it [ 41 ], and HCP remote assessments of patient-reported symptoms depend on their knowledge and experience with the individual patient [ 34 ]. Although most HCPs had limited experience and training in cancer and palliative care, no competence-raising measures were applied prior to RHC implementation for patients in the palliative phase of cancer.…”

“…In addition, lack of knowledge influenced the Reach (gatekeeping behavior) and Adoption (distrust in RHCs potential for providing palliative care) dimensions. These results emphasize the importance of offering an educational component that ensures adequate palliative care competence in HCPs before RHC is implemented in home-based palliative care [ 4 , 34 ].…”

Telehealth Needs and Concerns of Stakeholders in Pediatric Palliative Home Care

“…From the most relevant needs for both user groups, only ‘video consultation’ and ‘symptom questionnaires’ have previously been reported as relevant for PPHC. Furthermore, in adult Palliative Home Care (adult PHC), the lack of a messenger function has been reported, whereas the high priority needs ‘data transfer’ and ‘access to patient records’ are new findings for PPHC [ 5 , 23 ]. The application of telehealth to cover these needs is sought after using functions tailored to the individual team.…”

Use of active learning classrooms in health professional education: A scoping review

“…The first, second, and last authors used a qualitative approach to thematically group the data. We transformed the numerical data presented in tables and figures into a qualitative format ( Lundereng et al., 2023 ). First, the extracted data were read several times to produce an overview.…”