2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2004.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health care interventions for intimate partner violence: What women want

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
98
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
98
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…25 In our study, 92% of the women who reported making a protective action during the first week of follow-up performed more than one protective action-the most common safety behaviors being the construction of a safety plan and self-reported ending of the relationship. The variety and quantity of protective actions taken by the women in our study supports findings by Chang et al 26 that women in violent relationships desire direct access to multiple safety resources that preserve their autonomy and anonymity. The rapidity with which many of the participants in our study took protective action supports the theory that IPV victims often progress in a nonlinear or rapid fashion through the stages of change depending on the severity of abuse they are experiencing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…25 In our study, 92% of the women who reported making a protective action during the first week of follow-up performed more than one protective action-the most common safety behaviors being the construction of a safety plan and self-reported ending of the relationship. The variety and quantity of protective actions taken by the women in our study supports findings by Chang et al 26 that women in violent relationships desire direct access to multiple safety resources that preserve their autonomy and anonymity. The rapidity with which many of the participants in our study took protective action supports the theory that IPV victims often progress in a nonlinear or rapid fashion through the stages of change depending on the severity of abuse they are experiencing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The total number of participants was 1393, ranging between 7 95 and 879. 96 The quality score of the primary studies, appraised with the CASP criteria, was between 20 97 and 34, 98,99 with most of the studies scoring more than 27 out of a possible 41.…”
Section: Qualitative Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention defines IPV as ''physical violence, sexual violence, threats of physical/sexual violence, and psychological/emotional abuse perpetrated by a current or former spouse, common-law spouse, nonmarital dating partners, or boyfriends/girlfriends of the same or opposite sex.'' 4,5 Previous studies have linked IPV to a wide range of adverse health consequences, including injury, 3,[6][7][8] chronic pain, 9,10 gastrointestinal disorders, [11][12][13] sexually transmitted diseases, [14][15][16][17] disability, 18,19 poor pregnancy outcomes, 20 substance abuse, [21][22][23] depression, 24,25 post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), 26,27 and death. 28 Clearly, a gender gap exists in susceptibility to violence in general and IPV in particular, with most national surveys suggesting higher IPV rates in women versus men.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%