Health behavior interventions for university students measuring mental health outcomes: A scoping review

Abstract

IntroductionMany university students have poor mental health, and co-occurring health risk behaviors. Targeting health behavior change in this population may improve mental health outcomes. This scoping review describes the extent and range of randomized controlled trials (RCT) evaluating interventions targeting health risk behaviors and measuring a mental health outcome, among university students.MethodsSix electronic databases were searched for RCTs published until the 18th May 2021. Eligible RCTs included university students, evaluated interventions that promoted health behavior change (i.e., dietary intake, physical activity, sedentary behavior, alcohol and drug use, smoking, and sleep), and measured a mental health-related outcome.ResultsFifty-nine RCTs met the inclusion criteria that were published from 2000 to 2021, and over half (n = 33) were conducted in the United States. Interventions evaluated within the RCTs (n = 92) predominantly targeted changes to dietary intake (n = 41 interventions), physical activity (n = 39), or alcohol intake (n = 35). Most interventions targeted one (n = 51) or two (n = 27) health behaviors only. Included RCTs considered mental ill health outcomes (n = 24), psychological wellbeing outcomes (n = 20), or both (n = 15).DiscussionThis scoping review identified a moderate volume of experimental research investigating the impact of health behavior interventions on university students' mental health. There is scope for further research examining health behavior interventions targeting university students, particularly interventions taking a multi-behavioral approach.

Sleep duration and quality during the COVID‐19 pandemic and the association with physical activity and screen time among Brazilian college students

“…In addition, few studies have examined sleep, physical activity, and screen time in the young Brazilian university population during the pandemic (Stockwell et al, 2021). It's important to consider that university students are particularly susceptible to irregular sleep patterns and stress due to the demands of academic and social life, making them a population at risk for experiencing negative mental health symptoms (Hutchesson et al, 2023). Despite the existing extensive literature about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health, there are still gaps related to physical and mental health of university students.…”

Group-format, peer-facilitated mental health promotion interventions for students in higher education settings: a scoping review protocol

“…Prevention in relation to mental ill-health also encompasses other health behaviours (eg, dietary health, physical activity, sleep) that can have an impact on mental health outcomes. 21 Harnessing common practice elements can enable an evidence-informed approach to prevention even when a specific evidence-based intervention may be lacking (as may be the case in many LMIC settings where this research area is less developed). 17 22 …”

Characteristics of RCTs focusing on health promotion in community samples: a scoping review protocol based on the d-CoSPICO framework

“…The aforementioned aspects serve to highlight the need for a scoping review to help clarify concepts and definitions, summarise the results of existing studies, identify critical factors and detect gaps in the literature 11 12. Although there are previous reviews, they all refer to specific health promotion contexts or interventions 13 14. Thus, for example, an umbrella review of interventions on health risk behaviours in students conducted by Hutchesson et al 13 revealed a moderate volume of experimental research on university students’ mental health.…”

“… 11 12 Although there are previous reviews, they all refer to specific health promotion contexts or interventions. 13 14 Thus, for example, an umbrella review of interventions on health risk behaviours in students conducted by Hutchesson et al 13 revealed a moderate volume of experimental research on university students’ mental health. Another review aimed at providing an overview of artificial intelligence technologies in elderly healthcare by Ma et al 14 showed the great potential of artificial intelligence technologies in elderly healthcare.…”