Health authorities’ health risk communication with the public during pandemics: a rapid scoping review

Abstract

Background Responses from the H1N1 swine flu pandemic and the recent COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic provide an opportunity for insight into the role of health authorities’ ways of communicating health risk information to the public. We aimed to synthesise the existing evidence regarding different modes of communication used by health authorities in health risk communication with the public during a pandemic. Methods We conducted a rapid scoping review. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for publications in English from January 2009 through October 2020, covering both the full H1N1 pandemic and the response phase during the COVID-19 pandemic. The search resulted in 1440 records, of which 48 studies met our eligibility criteria. Results The present review identified studies across a broad interdisciplinary field of health risk communication. The majority focused on the H1N1 pandemic and the COVID-19 pandemic. A content analysis of the studies identified three categories for modes of communication: i) communication channels, ii) source credibility and iii) how the message is communicated. The identified studies on social media focused mainly on content and engagement, while studies on the effect of the use of social media and self-protective behaviour were lacking. Studies on the modes of communication that take the diversity of receivers in the field into account are lacking. A limited number of studies of health authorities’ use of graphic and audio-visual means were identified, yet these did not consider/evaluate creative communication choices. Conclusion Experimental studies that investigate the effect of health authorities’ videos and messages on social media platforms and self-protective behaviour are needed. More studies are needed across the fields of health risk communication and media studies, including visual communication, web design, video and digital marketing, at a time when online digital communication is central to reaching the public.

Predicting attitudes towards easing COVID-19 restrictions in the United States of America: The role of health concerns, demographic, political, and individual difference factors

“…Health-decision making, such as engagement in protective behaviors, is based on exposure to information regarding illness, processing of that information, and belief in the appropriateness of responses to address the threat [ 29 ]. This may include judgments regarding the extent to which information sources can be trusted or believed [ 30 ]. In the case of COVID-19, actual knowledge of restrictions [ 31 ] and trust in information related to COVID-19 (e.g., from public health professionals; [ 31 – 33 ]) have been investigated for their relationship to adherence to recommendations and requirements.…”

Emergence and Characterization of a Novel Reassortant Canine Influenza Virus Isolated from Cats

“…It has been documented that several RNA viruses had cross-species as "spillover" from domestic and wild animals to humans through cross-species transmission, resulting in the most notorious emerging zoonotic diseases, as represented by SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses [25][26][27]. Furthermore, the ability of rapid evolution with frequent recombination renders RNA viruses a significant public health risk [28,29].…”

The COVID-19 Pandemic: Some Thoughts on Integrity in Research and Communication

“…Should scientists serve as activists for truth and scientific knowledge? The suggestions we offer for communicating scientific information reflect principles described in the Singapore Statement on Research Integrity [ 7 ] and complement other guidelines relevant to diverse disciplines [ 8 ].…”