Health assessments and screening tools for adults experiencing homelessness: a systematic review

Abstract

Background Homelessness is increasing globally. It results in poorer physical and mental health than age matched people living in permanent housing. Better information on the health needs of people experiencing homelessness is needed to inform effective resourcing, planning and service delivery by government and care organisations. The aim of this review was to identify assessment tools that are valid, reliable and appropriate to measure the health status of people who are homeless. Methods Data sources: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed (and Medline), PsychInfo, Scopus, CINAHL and ERIC from database inception until September 2018. Key words used were homeless, homelessness, homeless persons, vagrancy, health status, health, health issues, health assessment and health screening. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO. The National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) hierarchy of evidence was applied; methodological quality of included articles was assessed using the McMaster critical appraisal tools and psychometric properties of the tools were appraised using the International Centre for Allied Health Evidence Ready Reckoner. Results Diverse tools and measures ( N = 71) were administered within, and across the reviewed studies ( N = 37), with the main focus being on general health, oral health and nutrition. Eleven assessment tools in 13 studies had evidence of appropriate psychometric testing for the target population in domains of quality of life and health status, injury, substance use, mental health, psychological and cognitive function. Methodological quality of articles and tools were assessed as moderate to good. No validated tools were identified to assess oral health, chronic conditions, anthropometry, demography, nutrition, continence, functional decline and frailty, or vision and hearing. However, assessments of physical constructs (such as oral health, anthropometry, vision and hearing) could be applied to homeless people on a presumption of validity, because the constructs would be measured with clinical indicators in the same manner as people living in permanent dwellings. Conclusions This review highlighted the need to develop consistent and comprehensive health assessment tools validated with, and tailored for, adults experiencing homelessness. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-7234-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A retrospective analysis of the health and social situation of homeless people in Berlin: study protocol

“…This also enables a morbidity analysis. At the very minimum, the compilation and structuring of medical and social information by building categories in order to create an exploratory data base may contribute to the development of standardised instruments in the field of homelessness research [ 52 ].…”

Somatische Erkrankungen Wohnungsloser in Deutschland. Ein narratives Literaturreview der Jahre 2009–2019

“…Die Codierung von Diagnosen erfolgte häufig nicht in strenger Orientierung an der ICD-10-Klassifikation, wodurch ein valider Vergleich der Studien untereinander oder mit repräsentativen Bevölkerungsdaten nur begrenzt möglich ist. Begründet erscheint daher die Forderung von Gordon et al nach der Entwicklung von Standardinstrumenten zur Erfassung der gesundheitlichen Lage von Wohnungslosen [37].…”

Factors associated with oral health-related quality of life in homeless persons: a cross-sectional study

“…8 Being homeless creates a barrier to health services and programs; homeless persons generally only have access to emergency health services. 9 Therefore, these individuals generally present a series of untreated health problems, which could be minimized by assistance, prevention, and health promotion services, including oral health services. 10,11 Previous studies have identified a high prevalence of oral health problems in homeless individuals.…”