Health and health-related indicators in slum, rural, and urban communities: a comparative analysis

Abstract

BackgroundIt is generally assumed that urban slum residents have worse health status when compared with other urban populations, but better health status than their rural counterparts. This belief/assumption is often because of their physical proximity and assumed better access to health care services in urban areas. However, a few recent studies have cast doubt on this belief. Whether slum dwellers are better off, similar to, or worse off as compared with rural and other urban populations remain poorly understood as indicators for slum dwellers are generally hidden in urban averages.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to compare health and health-related indicators among slum, rural, and other urban populations in four countries where specific efforts have been made to generate health indicators specific to slum populations.DesignWe conducted a comparative analysis of health indicators among slums, non-slums, and all urban and rural populations as well as national averages in Bangladesh, Kenya, Egypt, and India. We triangulated data from demographic and health surveys, urban health surveys, and special cross-sectional slum surveys in these countries to assess differences in health indicators across the residential domains. We focused the comparisons on child health, maternal health, reproductive health, access to health services, and HIV/AIDS indicators. Within each country, we compared indicators for slums with non-slum, city/urban averages, rural, and national indicators. Between-country differences were also highlighted.ResultsIn all the countries, except India, slum children had much poorer health outcomes than children in all other residential domains, including those in rural areas. Childhood illnesses and malnutrition were higher among children living in slum communities compared to those living elsewhere. Although treatment seeking was better among slum children as compared with those in rural areas, this did not translate to better mortality outcomes. They bear a disproportionately much higher mortality burden than those living elsewhere. Slum communities had higher coverage of maternal health services than rural communities but it was not possible to compare maternal mortality rates across these residential domains. Compared to rural areas, slum communities had lower fertility and higher contraceptive use rates but these differences were reversed when slums were compared to other urban populations. Slum–rural differences in infant mortality were found to be larger in Bangladesh compared to Kenya.ConclusionMortality and morbidity indicators were worse in slums than elsewhere. However, indicators of access to care and health service coverage were found to be better in slums than in rural communities.

Determining Factors for Slum Growth with Predictive Data Mining Methods

“…The corresponding values in North America, Europe, and East Asia were much lower and, according to the models presented, led to below-average slum growth, if slums existed at all. The connection between "Fertility rate" and slum growth confirmed statements made before in other studies [11]. As mentioned above, we cannot make any statements about causal relations, but only hypotheses about them.…”

HIV Diagnoses and Viral Suppression Among US Women in Rural and Nonrural Areas, 2010–2017

“…20 Likewise, socioeconomic factors such as income, employment, and education could put women living in rural areas who have HIV at further risk of getting their disease diagnosed late. 19,21 We found lower rates of viral suppression among women in rural areas compared with metropolitan areas and MSAs. However, this did not affect all women equally.…”

“…Later stage at HIV diagnosis in rural areas could be attributed to factors such as stigma, lack of access to health care, long travel distance and transportation‐related barriers to care, and a lack of knowledge of how to use services that prevent and treat disease . Likewise, socioeconomic factors such as income, employment, and education could put women living in rural areas who have HIV at further risk of getting their disease diagnosed late …”

Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Oral Hygiene among Urban Slum Dwellers in Pakistan

“…Pull factors operate in urban areas for the attraction of better health facilities, educational opportunities, civic facilities and more chances of getting employment. 1 Tooth decay is one of the most common disease in the slums due to poor oral hygiene. 2 Tooth decay through caries is known to be 4 times more common than asthma among adolescents.…”