1996
DOI: 10.1021/bk-1997-0652.ch001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health and Environmental Concerns Over the Use of Fumigants in Agriculture: The Case of Methyl Bromide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, with the increasing awareness of sustainable agricultural practices, several fumigants such as 1,3-dichloropropene and chloropicrin have been restricted due to their negative impacts on the environment. Even methyl bromide was banned in 2004 by the Montreal Protocol for its ability to deplete the ozone layer and increase global warming [18]. More issues are raised by using pesticides that are not effective enough against a wider spectrum of diseases due to their negative effects on beneficial soil organisms [19] or that kill non-target organisms such as insects (bees), fishes, birds and other wildlife organisms [20] or have direct impact on humans and foods [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with the increasing awareness of sustainable agricultural practices, several fumigants such as 1,3-dichloropropene and chloropicrin have been restricted due to their negative impacts on the environment. Even methyl bromide was banned in 2004 by the Montreal Protocol for its ability to deplete the ozone layer and increase global warming [18]. More issues are raised by using pesticides that are not effective enough against a wider spectrum of diseases due to their negative effects on beneficial soil organisms [19] or that kill non-target organisms such as insects (bees), fishes, birds and other wildlife organisms [20] or have direct impact on humans and foods [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since methyl bromide (MeBr) was phased out because of its contribution to the depletion of stratospheric ozone (Honaganahalli and Seiber, 1997), alternatives such as 1,3-dichloropropene (1,3-D) and chloropicrin (CP) have been used broadly. In recent years, additional potential MeBr alternatives have emerged.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1993, methyl bromide was classified as a class I ozone-depleting substance under the provisions of an international treaty known as Montreal Protocol for substances that deplete ozone. At this time, the Protocol recommended a phase-out of the use and production of methyl bromide in the United States and other developed countries by the year 2010 (Honaganahalli and Seiber 1996). Subsequently, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency acting under the Clean Air Act of 1990 initially set a much stricter phase-out date of January 1, 2001, which was ultimately postponed until January 1, 2005 (Ferguson and Padula 1994;Honaganahalli and Seiber 1996;Noling et al 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%