2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health and economic benefits of cleaner residential heating in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
34
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors found that the entire BTH region spent 1.4%–2.3% of GDP to support policy implementation and pointed out several directions to reduce the economic cost. Zhang et al (2019b) developed an integrated assessment model to investigate the health benefits of the residential “coal-to-electricity” policy. They found that Beijing obtained the most health benefits, and Hebei bore the highest cost.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors found that the entire BTH region spent 1.4%–2.3% of GDP to support policy implementation and pointed out several directions to reduce the economic cost. Zhang et al (2019b) developed an integrated assessment model to investigate the health benefits of the residential “coal-to-electricity” policy. They found that Beijing obtained the most health benefits, and Hebei bore the highest cost.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, energy-related carbon emissions do not directly pollute the local air even though climate change is aggravating. The “near-zero emission” policy of power plants ( Wang et al, 2018b ), clean residential heating ( Zhang et al, 2019b ), and other similar policies have been implemented. Accordingly, carbon and pollutant (e.g., SO 2 , soot, and industrial waste gas) emissions do not synchronously change in this region.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xu T., et al [ 16 ] use GAINS model and IMED|HEL model to evaluate PM 2.5 pollution-related health effects in China’s road transport sector. Xiang Z., et al [ 17 ] and Shaohui Z., et al [ 18 ] use GAINS model and IMED|HEL model to evaluate the health benefit of the residential heating and cement industry in the BTH region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 2015, policies for substituting residential coal use by electricity have been implemented in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Zhang et al figured out that the health benefits would appear almost immediately after the individuals are no longer exposed to indoor air pollution from coal use [13]. Xue also designed a difference-in-difference framework that takes advantage of spatial and time variations in the implementing China's centralized heating program; it found that the areas with centralized heating had a 1.2% decrease in the proportion of low-birth-weight infants [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most previous studies have focused on cooking, and only a few studies have examined the health effects of residential heating in the context of China [ 12 , 13 ]. Lin and Liu observed that indoor air pollution from coal burning significantly increased the diastolic and systolic blood pressure levels and likelihood of underweight [ 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%