1995
DOI: 10.1016/0266-4356(95)90045-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Healing of experimentally created defects: a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
57
0
7

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
2
57
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…1 However, potential complications emerging at the donor site, such as resorption without subsequent maintenance of bony contour and chronic pain, may accompany the procedure. 2,3 Therefore, research for alternative graft materials is ongoing. These graft materials should increase the bone volume in the grafted area to give initial stability at the implant site.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 However, potential complications emerging at the donor site, such as resorption without subsequent maintenance of bony contour and chronic pain, may accompany the procedure. 2,3 Therefore, research for alternative graft materials is ongoing. These graft materials should increase the bone volume in the grafted area to give initial stability at the implant site.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, several approaches have been attempted for defect filling and subsequent regeneration, including autogenous and xenogenous bone grafting and synthetic biomaterials [7]. Due to its ideal biocompatibility and osteogenic properties, autogenous bone taken from a secondary surgical site has been widely utilized and still considered as the ''golden standard'', such as the autogenous bone tissue derived from iliac crest grafted onto the intertransverse process for the fusion of the lumbar spine [8,9]. However, the use of autogenous bone has limitations, including availability and unpredictable healing kinetics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reconstructive craniomaxillofacial surgery, autogenous bone continues to be the most widely used graft material due to its favorable biological properties in terms of the formation of new bone tissue 1,9,20 . However, its utilization involves a number of inconveniences, such as the difficulty to predict the final outcome, insufficient amounts of autogenous bone, the need for extensive and long-lasting surgery to obtain the graft and the risk of infection at the donor site 2,11,13,17,21,25 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%