2013
DOI: 10.3390/molecules181113723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Headspace Solid-Phase Microextraction Analysis of Volatile Components in Narcissus tazetta var. chinensis Roem

Abstract: Abstract:The volatile components in single-flowered and double-flowered Chinese narcissus were identified by headspace-solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME) coupled with GC and GC/MS. Changes in aroma during the vase-life (days 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6) of two samples were also studied. A total of 35 compounds were identified, of which all were present in single-flowered and 26 in double-flowered samples. The main aroma components were (E)-β-ocimene, and benzyl acetate. Single-flowered narcissus have a higher pe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This difference is most likely due to the different plant species being tested, since, the extraction time depends on the chemical nature of the compounds present, the distribution constant, the fiber polymeric phase, and to the size of the molecular mass (e.g., polyunsaturated fatty acids and other compounds are expected to require longer extraction times depending on their lower partitioning and diffusion coefficient). The HS-SPME method has been used for extracting volatile compounds from flowers at room temperature, this method is favorable for flower VOCs analysis, because it minimizes high temperature artifacts [34]. In the present study, the results indicated that there were differences between intact and cut flower for the Floribunda cultivar, and intact flowers were superior to excised flower by total peak area.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 46%
“…This difference is most likely due to the different plant species being tested, since, the extraction time depends on the chemical nature of the compounds present, the distribution constant, the fiber polymeric phase, and to the size of the molecular mass (e.g., polyunsaturated fatty acids and other compounds are expected to require longer extraction times depending on their lower partitioning and diffusion coefficient). The HS-SPME method has been used for extracting volatile compounds from flowers at room temperature, this method is favorable for flower VOCs analysis, because it minimizes high temperature artifacts [34]. In the present study, the results indicated that there were differences between intact and cut flower for the Floribunda cultivar, and intact flowers were superior to excised flower by total peak area.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 46%
“…The volatile compounds were analyzed by Iglesias et al 17 . During the sampling time, the fiber was inserted into the headspace of the reaction vessel.…”
Section: Volatile Compound Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The typical methods used include liquid–liquid extraction, purge and trap, steam distillation (SD), simultaneous distillation extraction (SDE), supercritical-fluid extraction (SFE), solid-phase extraction (SPE), and solid-phase microextraction (SPME) [ 15 ]. SPME is simple, fast, sensitive, requires no solvent [ 16 ], and has been successfully used to analyze volatile compounds in a variety of flowering plants, such as Hosta , Tree peony, Styrax tonkinensis , Narcissus tazetta , and Phalaenopsis [ 8 , 15 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. Many of these floral fragrance volatiles are terpenes, phenylpropanoids, or fatty acid derivatives [ 5 , 13 , 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%