2007
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.76.075408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Headgroup dimerization in methanethiol monolayers on the Au(111) surface: A density functional theory study

Abstract: A long-standing controversy related to the dimer pattern formed by S atoms in methanethiol (CH3SH) on the Au(111) surface has been resolved using density functional theory. For the first time, dimerization of methanethiol adsorbates on the Au(111) surface is established by computational modeling. For methylthiolate (CH3S), it is shown that the S atoms do not dimerize at high coverage but reveal a dimer pattern at intermediate coverage. Molecular dynamics simulation at high coverage demonstrates that the observ… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
16
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(55 reference statements)
4
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The radical‐based description of the adsorption process is the one commonly involved in the theoretical description of metal/SAM interfaces; the corresponding values reported in that study range between −1.5 and −2.0 eV and are in good agreement with other values reported from DFT calculations 32. 3942, 64, 65, 67, 68 The values of approximately −1.9 (≈44) and −2.2 eV (≈51 kcal mol −1 ) found for the bridge position in CH 3 S/Au and CF 3 S/Au, respectively, have the same order of magnitude as the SAu bond strength, which is of the order of 40–50 kcal mol −1 69. 70 The results obtained for the fcc position are systematically lower by 0.2–0.4 eV.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The radical‐based description of the adsorption process is the one commonly involved in the theoretical description of metal/SAM interfaces; the corresponding values reported in that study range between −1.5 and −2.0 eV and are in good agreement with other values reported from DFT calculations 32. 3942, 64, 65, 67, 68 The values of approximately −1.9 (≈44) and −2.2 eV (≈51 kcal mol −1 ) found for the bridge position in CH 3 S/Au and CF 3 S/Au, respectively, have the same order of magnitude as the SAu bond strength, which is of the order of 40–50 kcal mol −1 69. 70 The results obtained for the fcc position are systematically lower by 0.2–0.4 eV.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[107][108][109][110][111] Only recently, further theoretical studies could partially reconcile these discrepancies by finding that, while at full coverage adsorption as individual thiolates is clearly preferable, dimerization might indeed occur at lower coverage. [112] Adding to the confusion, further experimental evidence has been advanced, which put the sulfur exclusively at the singly coordinated on-top sites of a defect-free Au(111) surface. [113,114] These persistent inconsistencies among different experiments as well as between experiment and theory eventually led to the notion of more severe reconstructions of the topmost gold layer upon SAM formation.…”
Section: Notes On the Atomistic Structure Of The Thiol/gold Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 It was also reported that dissociation of dimethyl disulfide (CH 3 SSCH 3 ) adsorbed on the Au(111) surface can be accomplished by applying a voltage of ∼1.4 V. 37 Existence of disulfide bonds has long been a controversy for alkanethiols and dialkyl disulfides adsorbed on gold surfaces. [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] Thus, we posed the following questions: What if the application of the bias voltage induces the formation or breakage of the disulfide bonds of 1? Would this conversion between cyclic and acyclic 1,2-dithiolane anchor groups alter the electron transport through 1, serving as an additional switching mechanism for 1 and affecting the robustness of the junction?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%