2004 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages - Human Centric Computing
DOI: 10.1109/vlhcc.2004.29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Header and Unit Inference for Spreadsheets Through Spatial Analyses

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
130
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
130
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A chain of labels, 1 [ 2 ], represents cells that may have a second level label. In this example, the cell B3 has the header A3, which contains the label Camry.…”
Section: Labelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A chain of labels, 1 [ 2 ], represents cells that may have a second level label. In this example, the cell B3 has the header A3, which contains the label Camry.…”
Section: Labelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can also take into account layout information. Techniques for header inference have been described in detail elsewhere [1,2]. In the context of this paper we simply reuse those techniques.…”
Section: Header Inferencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The systems described in [5,6] allow the user to carry out consistency checking of spreadsheet formulas on the basis of user annotations, or on the basis of automatically inferred headers [1], and flag the inconsistent formulas as potential faults. Consistency checking can also be carried out using assertions on the range of values allowed in spreadsheet cells [8].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To carry out testing in commercially available spreadsheet systems like Microsoft Excel, users are forced to proceed in an ad hoc manner because tool support for testing is not available. 1 In particular, the lack of tools leaves users without information about how much of their spreadsheet has been tested. In this situation, users come away with a very high level of confidence about the correctness of their spreadsheets even when, in reality, their spreadsheets have many non-trivial errors in them [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%