Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence and the characteristics of seizure-like activities during head-up tilt test (HUT)-induced syncope, in patients with suspected vasovagal syncope (VVS). We also evaluated the differences in hemodynamic parameters between patients with and without seizure-like activities.A total of 71 patients with suspected VVS, who showed syncope during HUT between October 2010 and May 2013, were analyzed. Electrocardiogram and hemodynamic parameters were continuously monitored during HUT. We also performed video recording of patients during HUT to identify eyeball deviation or seizure-like limb movements.In all, 47 patients (66.2%) showed seizure-like activities at the time of syncope during HUT, 14 patients presented eyeball deviation, without abnormal limb movements, and 33 patients showed abnormal limb movements, such as myoclonic or tonic-clonic activities, as well as eyeball deviation. Upon comparison of the 2 groups with or without seizure-like activities, patients showing seizure-like activities presented a significantly lower heart rate at the time of syncope in HUT (38.51 ± 16.81 vs 49.67 ± 20.12, P < .05). Also, upon comparison within patients showing seizure-like activities, the patients who showed abnormal limb movements with eyeball deviation demonstrated a significantly lower systolic blood pressure and cardiac output at the time of syncope (34.30 ± 12.24 vs 49.00 ± 14.14, P < .05; 0.58 ± 0.40 vs 1.32 ± 0.97, P < .05).Seizure-like activities were observed in high percentage in about 66% of patients during HUT-induced syncope. The occurrence of seizure-like activities was associated with more severe transient hemodynamic changes, such as lower heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and cardiac output at the time of the HUT-induced syncope.
The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence and the characteristics of seizure-like activities during head-up tilt test (HUT)-induced syncope, in patients with suspected vasovagal syncope (VVS). We also evaluated the differences in hemodynamic parameters between patients with and without seizure-like activities.A total of 71 patients with suspected VVS, who showed syncope during HUT between October 2010 and May 2013, were analyzed. Electrocardiogram and hemodynamic parameters were continuously monitored during HUT. We also performed video recording of patients during HUT to identify eyeball deviation or seizure-like limb movements.In all, 47 patients (66.2%) showed seizure-like activities at the time of syncope during HUT, 14 patients presented eyeball deviation, without abnormal limb movements, and 33 patients showed abnormal limb movements, such as myoclonic or tonic-clonic activities, as well as eyeball deviation. Upon comparison of the 2 groups with or without seizure-like activities, patients showing seizure-like activities presented a significantly lower heart rate at the time of syncope in HUT (38.51 ± 16.81 vs 49.67 ± 20.12, P < .05). Also, upon comparison within patients showing seizure-like activities, the patients who showed abnormal limb movements with eyeball deviation demonstrated a significantly lower systolic blood pressure and cardiac output at the time of syncope (34.30 ± 12.24 vs 49.00 ± 14.14, P < .05; 0.58 ± 0.40 vs 1.32 ± 0.97, P < .05).Seizure-like activities were observed in high percentage in about 66% of patients during HUT-induced syncope. The occurrence of seizure-like activities was associated with more severe transient hemodynamic changes, such as lower heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and cardiac output at the time of the HUT-induced syncope.
Background and Objectives:The head-up tilt test (HUT) is widely used for the diagnosis of vasovagal syncope.To improve the sensitivity of the test, provocation with isoproterenol is frequently used. The aim of this study was to evaluate the values of isosorbide dinitrate spray as a provocation drug in the HUT. Subjects and Methods: Two hundred patients, undergoing baseline HUT (60°for 20 minutes) for suspected vasovagal syncope or presyncope and unexplained dizziness, were enrolled. If the baseline HUT was negative, isosorbide dinitrate (2.5 mg) spray was applied sublingually (group I, n=93), or isoproterenol (3 μg/min) infused (group II, n=93), in a randomized fashion. The values of isosorbide dinitrate and isoproterenol were compared in those patients that developed a positive vasovagal response or who completed the drug-provocative HUT. Results:Syncope was similarly reproduced in both groups (47.7 vs. 41.9%, p>0.05). Type I responses were most common in both groups, and types I and II responses were more common in group I than group II (78.0 vs. 55.6% and 12.2 vs. 5.6%, p<0.05, respectively). The average time to a positive response was longer in group I than group II (8.5±3.4 vs. 6.1±3.6 minutes, p<0.01). The sensitivity and specificity of the drug-provocative HUT were significantly higher in group I than group II (73.5 and 87.5% vs. 58.5 and 71.1%; respectively, p<0.01). The incidence of minor adverse effects were similar in both groups, but serious cardiac side effects were significantly more common in group II than group I (4.3 vs. 0%, p<0.05). Conclusion:Sublingual isosorbide dinitrate spray may be used as a simple, effective and well tolerated provocative drug during HUT.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.