2013
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.24844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Head‐to‐head comparison of sirolimus‐eluting stent versus bare metal stent evaluation of the coronary endothelial dysfunction in the same patient presenting with multiple coronary artery lesions: The CREDENTIAL study

Abstract: in the same patients, but treating different coronary segments, SES implantation induces a higher rate of vasoconstriction compared to BMS. The increased vasoconstriction after iiAch is an indicator of ED.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By treating stenosis the ischemic trigger of angiogenesis is reduced [25] and this might be explained by the increase of VEGF levels [26]. This issue is relevant considering endothelial dysfunction after drug eluting stent apposition when compared with bare metal stent [27, 28]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By treating stenosis the ischemic trigger of angiogenesis is reduced [25] and this might be explained by the increase of VEGF levels [26]. This issue is relevant considering endothelial dysfunction after drug eluting stent apposition when compared with bare metal stent [27, 28]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) Vasoconstriction at juxta-SES-implanted coronary segments, which results in the formation of AS in non-target vessels. In evaluating the endothelial function influenced by SES or bare metal stents, vasoconstriction induced by acetylcholine provocation test, as a hallmark of endothelial dysfunction, is elevated at juxta-SES-implanted coronary segments compared with that in the juxta-bare metal stents coronary segment in patients with multiple lesions (Mischie et al, 2013). This finding implies that RAPA may trigger the AS cascade, as impaired endothelial cell function initiates the formation of AS adjacent to the stented vascular segments (Bonetti et al, 2003), with more in-stent restenosis at the edge of SES.…”
Section: The Main Challenge To the Application Of Rapamycinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discouraging the use of mTOR inhibition is the fact that rapamycin significantly attenuates both endothelial function and the expression of eNOS in human endothelial cell lines in vitro , although it does not cause endothelial cell death [ 144 ]. Studies with mTOR-inhibiting drugs, among others applied on coronary stents in patients with advanced arterial aging, have reported deleterious effects of such drugs on various variables of endothelial (dys)function, although conflicting results are abundant [ 145 , 146 , 147 , 148 , 149 ]. It is unclear whether the conflicting results are dependent on the concentration of the mTOR inhibitor to which the endothelial cells are exposed, which presumably is very high in the case of drug-eluting stents.…”
Section: Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%