2012
DOI: 10.1063/1.4762847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Head-on-collision of modulated dust acoustic waves in strongly coupled dusty plasma

Abstract: The derivative expansion perturbation method is applied to a strongly coupled dusty plasma system consisting of negatively charged dust grains, electrons, and ions. The basic equations are reduced to a nonlinear Schrödinger type equation appropriate for describing the modulated dust acoustic (DA) waves. We have examined the modulation (in) stability and the dependence of the system physical parameters (angular frequency and group velocity) on the polarization force variation. Finally, the extended Poincaré-Lig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that the spherical waves are more structurally stable to perturbations than the cylindrical waves. As the used numerical physical parameter values are inspired from recent experimental data, 23,24,26,49 we believe that the present results are helpful to existing and forthcoming experimental and space observations, where nonthermal SCDP is present. 48 APPENDIX: THE EXPLICIT EXPRESSIONS OF THE COEFFICIENTS MENTIONED IN EQS.…”
Section: -7mentioning
confidence: 63%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This suggests that the spherical waves are more structurally stable to perturbations than the cylindrical waves. As the used numerical physical parameter values are inspired from recent experimental data, 23,24,26,49 we believe that the present results are helpful to existing and forthcoming experimental and space observations, where nonthermal SCDP is present. 48 APPENDIX: THE EXPLICIT EXPRESSIONS OF THE COEFFICIENTS MENTIONED IN EQS.…”
Section: -7mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Moreover, we consider the viscosity contribution [g(f) is the bulk (shear) viscosity coefficient, and g L ¼ f þ ðg=3Þ is the longitudinal viscosity coefficient] is small compared to the compressibility contribution. 24 As discussed in Refs. 21 and 24, simulation and model calculations typically show that g L $ 0:08 for C s $ 10, whereas l d $ 1 in that region.…”
Section: Derivation Of the Modified Nlsementioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations