2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10967-018-5734-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HDEHP-CMPO/SiO2-P: a promising solid-phase extractant for uranium recovery from different acidic media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As displayed in Table S4 and Figure S8, the correlation coefficients ( R 2 ) obtained by fitting the adsorption data with the Langmuir model and Freundlich model were 0.9959 and 0.9742, respectively. The fitting results showed that the Langmuir model was more suitable for the adsorption process of AO-OBHSPIMs than the Freundlich model, and the adsorption process was monolayer adsorption . The results of thermodynamic parameters obtained by fitting the adsorption data (Supporting Information Section S6) are shown in Figure S9 and Table S5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As displayed in Table S4 and Figure S8, the correlation coefficients ( R 2 ) obtained by fitting the adsorption data with the Langmuir model and Freundlich model were 0.9959 and 0.9742, respectively. The fitting results showed that the Langmuir model was more suitable for the adsorption process of AO-OBHSPIMs than the Freundlich model, and the adsorption process was monolayer adsorption . The results of thermodynamic parameters obtained by fitting the adsorption data (Supporting Information Section S6) are shown in Figure S9 and Table S5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fitting results showed that the Langmuir model was more suitable for the adsorption process of AO-OBHSPIMs than the Freundlich model, and the adsorption process was monolayer adsorption. 42 The results of thermodynamic parameters obtained by fitting the adsorption data (Supporting Information Section S6) are shown in Figure S9 and Table S5. ΔG was negative, and its value fell with rising temperature.…”
Section: Influences Of the Contact Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the calculated value (q m ) was 421 mg g −1 which was not much different from the experimental results q e (415 mg g −1 ), indicating that the Langmuir equation had a higher correlation and the adsorption process was monolayer adsorption. 49 3.2.4 Effect of temperature. As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Contact Timementioning
confidence: 99%