2018
DOI: 10.1109/access.2018.2873755
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HDA: Cross-Project Defect Prediction via Heterogeneous Domain Adaptation With Dictionary Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this method does not resolve the class imbalance problem before applying transfer learning. Xu et al [11] developed heterogeneous domain adaptation with dictionary learning for HDP. This method employed the domain adaptation method to insert the data from the two projects and then measured the difference between them using dictionary learning to predict the defects.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this method does not resolve the class imbalance problem before applying transfer learning. Xu et al [11] developed heterogeneous domain adaptation with dictionary learning for HDP. This method employed the domain adaptation method to insert the data from the two projects and then measured the difference between them using dictionary learning to predict the defects.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, we should investigate more advanced imbalance learning methods since the class imbalance problem is more serious in SVP when compared to SDP [18]. Except for the withinproject SVP scenario considered in our study, the cross-project SVP scenario [49,50] also needs investigation. Cross-project SVP denotes that SVP models are constructed from one project and then used to predict potentially vulnerable modules in another project.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, many other supervised and unsupervised models (e.g., CCUM [14], TLEL [19], and MULTI [20]) have been proposed to push forward the state of the arts. Fukushima et al [47] found given a project with a few historical changes, we could use the changes from other projects as the training data to build the prediction model, as followed by other research [48], [49]. More recently, some study [50], [51] focuses on the impact of classification techniques, and some other study [52]- [57] attempts to handle the problem of imbalanced data in effort-aware JIT-SDP.…”
Section: A Effort-aware Jit-sdpmentioning
confidence: 99%