2006
DOI: 10.1086/508684
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HD 71636, A Newly Discovered Eclipsing Binary

Abstract: Our differential BV photometric observations, acquired with an automated telescope at Fairborn Observatory, show that HD 71636 is an eclipsing binary. From follow-up red-wavelength spectroscopic observations we classify the primary and secondary as an F2 dwarf and an F5 dwarf, respectively. The system has a period of 5.01329 days and a circular orbit. We used the Wilson-Devinney program to simultaneously solve our BV light curves and radial velocities and determined a number of fundamental properties of the sy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We believe, however, that this is due to problems with the published radii. A re-analysis of the light curves by Henry et al (2006) indicates that the ratio between the (relative) radii is significantly more uncertain than given by the authors 11 , most probably because the secondary eclipse is far from being well-covered.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Binariesmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…We believe, however, that this is due to problems with the published radii. A re-analysis of the light curves by Henry et al (2006) indicates that the ratio between the (relative) radii is significantly more uncertain than given by the authors 11 , most probably because the secondary eclipse is far from being well-covered.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Binariesmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The latter is often determined from the result of the solar calibration (Y ⊙ − Y P )/Z ⊙ and for any other star of known metallicity, the helium abundance is scaled to the solar one as . Most of the conclusions drawn when comparing theoretical isochrones with binaries (Torres et al 2002, 2006; Torres & Ribas 2002; Lacy et al 2005; Boden, Torres & Latham 2006; Henry et al 2006) and field stars (e.g. Allende Prieto & Lambert 1999; Valenti & Fischer 2005) thus reflect this tacit assumption on the helium content.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the conclusions drawn when comparing theoretical isochrones with binaries (e.g. Torres & Ribas 2002;Lacy et al 2005;Torres et al 2006;Boden, Torres & Latham 2006;Henry et al 2006) and field stars (e.g. thus reflect this tacit assumption on the helium content.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe, however, that this is due to problems with the published radii. A re-analysis of the light curves by Henry et al (2006) indicates that the ratio between the (relative) radii is significantly more uncertain than given by the authors 11 , most probably because the secondary eclipse is far from being wellcovered.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Binariesmentioning
confidence: 81%