2007
DOI: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HCV and CSFV IRES domain II mediate eIF2 release during 80S ribosome assembly

Abstract: Internal ribosome entry site (IRES) RNAs from the hepatitis C virus (HCV) and classical swine fever virus (CSFV) coordinate cap-independent assembly of eukaryotic 48S initiation complexes, consisting of the 40S ribosomal subunit, eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 3 and the eIF2/GTP/ Met-tRNA i Met ternary complex. Here, we report that these IRESes also play a functional role during 80S ribosome assembly downstream of 48S complex formation, in promoting eIF5-induced GTP hydrolysis and eIF2/GDP release from the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
183
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(117 reference statements)
11
183
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Following elution of the complexes, the presence of initiation factors was analyzed by Western blotting. As expected and in agreement with previous studies (Locker et al 2007), complexes assembled onto the HCV IRES contained eIF3 but not eIF4E or eIF4G (Fig. 4B).…”
Section: Inactivation Of Eif4e Inhibits Vflip Ires Activitysupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following elution of the complexes, the presence of initiation factors was analyzed by Western blotting. As expected and in agreement with previous studies (Locker et al 2007), complexes assembled onto the HCV IRES contained eIF3 but not eIF4E or eIF4G (Fig. 4B).…”
Section: Inactivation Of Eif4e Inhibits Vflip Ires Activitysupporting
confidence: 80%
“…www.rnajournal.org 1807 recruitment, while we previously demonstrated that a loop structure within domain II mediates the 60S subunit joining event (Locker et al 2007). Therefore, a deep understanding of the structures accessible to RNA is required to decipher IRES-mediated regulation during translation.…”
Section: Vflip Ires Activity Requires Eif4g and Eif4ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…HCV IRES domain II enhances binding of the coding sequence in the mRNA-binding cleft of 40S subunits by inducing conformational changes, including rotation of the head relative to the body, opening of the entry latch of the mRNA-binding cleft, and closure of the cleft at the exit side (Kolupaeva et al 2000a, Spahn et al 2001. The larger size of domain II of the SPV9 IRES compared to HCV and CSFV-like IRESs (Lukavsky et al 2003;Hellen and de Breyne 2007;Locker et al 2007) may result in it making additional contacts with the 40S subunit resulting in additional conformational changes in the bound ribosome compared to those caused by binding of the HCV IRES (Spahn et al 2001) which may account for the ability of the SPV9 IRES to promote eIF2-independent binding of Met-tRNA i Met to the P site. We suggested that HP-like IRESs are modular elements that have exchanged between flaviviruses (which include HCV and CSFV) and some picornaviruses (such as SPV9) by recombination .…”
Section: The Mechanism Of Initiation On the Spv9 Iresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HP IRESs consist of the z100-nt-long domain II, which enhances 48S complex formation and subunit joining, domain III, which contains a pseudoknot and several branched hairpins that together bind eIF3 and the 40S subunit, and a sequence between the pseudoknot and the initiation codon that in CSFV is unstructured and in HCV forms the hairpin domain IV (Reynolds et al 1995;Honda et al 1996;Pestova et al 1998b;Sizova et al 1998;Kolupaeva et al 2000a,b;Kieft et al 2001;Pisarev et al 2005;Locker et al 2007). The coding sequences adjacent to HCV and CSFV IRESs are unrelated but both unstructured, which contributes to initiation efficiency (Reynolds et al 1995;Fletcher et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These IRESes also use the eIF2 Á tRNA Á GTP ternary complex and upon GTP hydrolysis, codon-anticodon dependent release of GDP/phosphate, and the action of eIF5B, the 60S ribosomal subunit binds to form the 80S ribosome-IRES complex, followed by the first peptide bond formation Unbehaun et al 2004;Locker et al 2007). Various IRES RNA secondary structure elements, including a pseudoknot near the 39 end of the IRES (Wang et al 1995), have been shown to influence the 40S subunit, eIF3, and ternary complex recruitment, as well as eIF2 release and 80S ribosome formation (Wang et al 1995;Kieft et al 2001;Ji et al 2004;Otto and Puglisi 2004;Locker et al 2007).…”
Section: Viral Ires Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%